Get YOUR Own Free Affiliate Cash-Pulling Website. Make Up To $13,500 Per Month Commissions!
 




Get Reviewed by this Blog for only $500
DealDotComTTZ MediaGoogle Adsense
Pepperjam NetworkBidvertiser
Text Link AdsKonterra

I just got the word that Google has decided that only allowing me (and others like me) to run AdSense and IntelliTXT on the same page is not fair to all the other AdSense publishers who are not like me. Therefore, Google has ruled that AdSense can be used with other contextual advertising services, provided they do not look like Google ads. That means everyone can now run AdSense and Vibrant Media IntelliTXT on the same page!

This new rule applies to all contextual advertising service. Therefore, if you’re using Kontara, or any other contextual ad network, you can run them as long as they don’t look like Google ads. It is good to see Google finally give some good news after releasing their latest TOS update. The only problem I can see for new publishers is Vibrant Media requires 500,000 page views per month in order for a site to run IntelliTXT. But at least you can run it on pages with Google ads now!

With this ruling, Google is really putting the screws to Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN). If you wish to run YPN, it cannot show up on any pages with AdSense ads in them and the YPN ads must not use the same color scheme as the AdSense ads. Given that choice, many publishers will either give up YPN or give up Google. Google feels most will give up YPN because of AdSense superior ad targeting technology.

Now that Google has allowed everyone to run AdSense and IntelliTXT on the same page, I don’t feel so special anymore. :(

Find out what I am doing right now by following me on Twitter! If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.

Make Money Online with John Chow's Ad Network - Join TTZ Media Now!
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here's A Few More Related Posts

  • How To Increase Kontera/IntelliTXT Revenue
  • Making Money With Your Blog - Week 2
  • Part Time Blogging, Full Time Income?
  • The Digg Effect
  • Laptop Gamers February ‘06 Results

    RSS feed | Trackback URI

    43 Comments »

    Comment by Stephen
    2007-01-20 01:04:54
    MyAvatars 0.2

    We’re still special! We still have “Our People” at Google that we can email or call if we have problems ;)

    Comment by Leftblank
    2007-01-20 10:45:22
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Pfft, rich kids ;)

    Comment by Alex Becker
    2007-01-20 11:15:14
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I guess its all about connections.

     
     
     
    Comment by Allen.H
    2007-01-20 02:30:44
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Oh don’t you start whining now, i saw the Christmas they sent you ;)

    Allen.H

     
    Comment by Philomena Ojikutu
    2007-01-20 02:33:28
    MyAvatars 0.2

    John that’s good news but Vibrant Media Intellitext rigidity is still unfair.

    You were admitted at the peak of your Digg-induced page view of 329,000+ and you have never cross the 500,000 mark with your blog, in fact you went as low as 185,000 during the low traffic period of December, 2006.

    They should give bloggers like us who are doing over 100,000+ page views per month a chance to come into Intellitext too.

    If ‘Almighty’ Google can bend, why not intellitext?

    Comment by Kiltak
    2007-01-20 10:31:22
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Since John is running Intellitext on the TechZone, he probably can grab the code and implement it on any site he runs, even if they have less then 500k page views…

    Comment by John Chow
    2007-01-20 10:35:49
    MyAvatars 0.2

    That is correct. Once you get the first site in, you can add any other sites you own no matter what the traffic level.

    Comment by Stephen
    2007-01-20 11:11:15
    MyAvatars 0.2

    You got it Pontiac! Big sites rule. Little sites drool ;)

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
    Comment by Michael Kwan
    2007-01-20 15:40:41
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I guess that makes me a drooler.

     
     
    Comment by Alex Becker
    2007-01-20 11:15:59
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Ha, I wish I had a website that had that many vies a month.

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
    Comment by Tyler
    2007-01-20 14:58:44
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Actually I do run a site with at least that many pageviews. Though we don’t do advertising on it.

    Though I don’t think I could use it for getting intelitext onto my blog though.

     
     
     
    Comment by Nate W.
    2007-01-20 04:10:42
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I am interested why Intellitext is so strict about letting new bloggers in. You would think they would want as many people as possible advertising them. It seems like a great service, but why the 500,000 pageview minimum?

    Comment by Ryan
    2007-01-20 14:00:35
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I think this is because they’ve got to provide enough clicks for their advertisers so that it is profitable for them. If the advertiser expects to convert a specific % of their clicks they want to ensure they get enough clicks to be profitable.

    Comment by Raghu
    2007-01-22 08:13:19
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Agreed, but the higher the entry criteria the tougher it will be to get people subscribed to use their service. But guess 500,000 is the magic number !

     
    Comment by Jane
    2007-01-22 10:42:58
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Ah, the good ole’ 80/20 rule in play…let the 20% of blogs that make the min reqs in and the 80%…well, just out of luck until they make something happen…I’m in the 80%, but I hope to make something happen!

     
     
     
    Comment by Scott Howard
    2007-01-20 04:12:42
    MyAvatars 0.2

    cool, and I never was a big fan of Yahoo anyway.

     
    Comment by HMTKSteve
    2007-01-20 04:43:05
    MyAvatars 0.2

    So John, you going to post this on TTZ ’cause I can’t submit your blog to Digg!!!

    Comment by Allen.H
    2007-01-20 06:21:04
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I don’t think it’s something you should submit from a blog, dozens already wrote about it. Maybe post directly to the TOS or something like that, but that’s not something unique that would hit digg’s frontpage. The digg culture around John’s blog might have got it there though, if the blog wasn’t banned =\

    Allen.H

    Comment by HMTKSteve
    2007-01-20 07:00:17
    MyAvatars 0.2

    It’s already on Digg and Netscape.

    Comment by Leftblank
    2007-01-20 10:46:39
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Well, he’s not reporting new news though, it was all over the web a couple of days ago so adding it to Digg wouldn’t have much use in the first place ;)

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
    Comment by Alex Becker
    2007-01-20 11:16:54
    MyAvatars 0.2

    yea Digg wont appreciate it if its a double post

     
     
     
     
     
    Comment by Marc
    2007-01-20 06:39:33
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I think it’s great to see Google flexing. I think they’re realising that the all or nothing approach did alienate a segment of the market. This is their chance to be out there all over and try and prove themselves with their product.

     
    Comment by HMTKSteve
    2007-01-20 07:01:49
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I always felt their “there can be only one” tactic showed a lack of faith in their product…

    Then again, they might be looking at possible charges of being labeled a monopoly!

     
    Comment by Nomar
    2007-01-20 07:36:20
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Good News !!

     
    Comment by Ryan
    2007-01-20 07:50:47
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Oh come on now, you’re still special. :P

    I agree, it’s good to see Google opening up to something that, in all honestly, should be allowed anyway.

     
    Comment by Tyler
    2007-01-20 08:17:15
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Nice to see Google allows others to play nicely with them. Though I don’t get 500,000 pageviews a month. December I had 1500 pageviews and so far in Jan2007 I’m at 1800 pageviews. Where as in November of 2006 I had only 300 pageviews.

    So I’ve got a LONG way to go!

     
    Comment by My New Choice
    2007-01-20 08:18:22
    MyAvatars 0.2

    As I mentioned over at ProBlogger, it is nice to see that Google is opening the door to competing ads. For smaller sites/blogs like myself, I am still trying to establish myself with Adsense so I don’t think I will be taking advantage of it any time soon.

    John, you can still feel special because a good number of us don’t qualify yet for the other ad programs that you use.

     
    Comment by Hannes Johnson Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-01-20 09:48:45
    MyAvatars 0.2

    If you wish to run YPN, it cannot show up on any pages with AdSense ads in them…

    - Is that correct? With the latest TOS changes doesn’t it mean that Google allows YPN on the same website as AdSense - but the YPN ads can’t look like AdSense ads?

    Comment by John Chow
    2007-01-20 10:38:48
    MyAvatars 0.2

    YPN ads has to look different from Google’s and are not allowed on the same page.

     
     
    Comment by Stew
    2007-01-20 09:53:29
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I’ve been running the two together for over a year :X

    Never had any problems… Ah well, at least I’m 100% legitimate now :)

    Comment by Leftblank
    2007-01-20 10:51:20
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I guess that makes you a lucky man then ;)

     
     
    Comment by Mubin
    2007-01-20 11:29:27
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Anyone know how they measure the 500,000 page views?

    Will they take awstats?

    Comment by Ryan
    2007-01-20 14:02:01
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I wonder the same thing, but I guess something like Google Analytics is pretty reliable.

     
     
    Comment by Alex Becker
    2007-01-20 12:16:08
    MyAvatars 0.2

    John- I noticed that you have an image ad from H&R block. I just remembered its tax season, This sucks.

     
    Comment by John Hood
    2007-01-20 13:47:20
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Great news! Now if only IntelliTXT would accept my blogs!

    Comment by Alex Becker
    2007-01-20 14:25:22
    MyAvatars 0.2

    haha Yea Im facing the same problem

     
     
    Comment by Jacob
    2007-01-20 14:32:43
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Are there any other programs that you recommend small webmasters to sign up for then? I know you mentioned in the post that IntelliTXT requires 500,000 views a month. I obviously don’t get that, but are there any other good programs that one should sign up for?

    Comment by Michael Kwan
    2007-01-20 15:43:10
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I was wondering the same. What other ways can I try to monetize my blog other than with Adsense? Those product ads at the end of your posts… what network is that?

    Comment by Alex Becker
    2007-01-20 16:03:20
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I think those are TTZ media network.
    I myself am trying to get Text Link Ads.

     
     
     
    Comment by StrangeProgress
    2007-01-21 03:45:52
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I wonder if Intellitext is at all flexible on the pageviews, for example 500,000 page views on some types of sites is largely low quality traffic, while my 200,000 or so are highly focused and draw a ton of specific search traffic. I’ll have to check with them on that.

     
    Comment by Raghu
    2007-01-22 08:11:42
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Good news for you biggies (other than John Chow ofcourse) that they can now run Adsense and IntelliTXT together.

    I really think that 500,000+ page views is way too high for an entry - any way it does not matter for me :-)

    I try to use Kontera but unfortunately it does not seem to work efficiently at all for me - Is anybody using it ?

     
    Comment by Jane
    2007-01-22 10:45:12
    MyAvatars 0.2

    John…when you first registerd for IntelliTXT, what were the min requirements then?

     
    Comment by Nick Witkoski
    2007-01-26 05:10:21
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I say try for kontera first, i dont know what their payouts are compared to intellitext but i do know that I was accepted and i get far fewer than 500k

    Does anyone know anything about chitika? is it worth it? is it allowed with adsense?

     
    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI
    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.