John Chow dot Com Free WordPress Installation - Start Your Blog Today!
 

AndrewTalk – How Not To Do a Blog

written by John Chow on August 14, 2007

Build Your Online Business Now

What Was He Thinking?

Sometimes I wonder what goes through the mind of a blogger when he orders a ReviewMe review from John Chow dot Com. Take for example the case of AndrewTalk. This is a blog about online business. It is presumably own by someone name Andrew. AndrewTalk is a good example on how not to do a blog. After reading this, you’ll understand why and you’ll also wonder what Andrew was thinking by order this review.

Who Is AndrewTalk?

Who is AndrewTalk? Your guess is as good as mine. The blog has no about page and the posts have no author links. The only message Andrew left me in the review request was:

This is a brand new blog about internet business. Encourage your visitors to keep visiting my blog because they will get good posts every day.

I had to do a WhoIs to find out that the owner’s name was Andrei Raileanu and had to go all the way back to the blog’s first post to find any information about him and even then it didn’t offer much except to say Andrew is a 21 year old from Eastern-Europe and the owner of Dev3, a web design and programming company.

If you are going to create a “make money online” blog, branding is everything. What makes you an authority on the subject? You can’t create a brand when readers don’t even know your full name.

Using Stolen Content Is Not The Way To Build a Blog

It took me a few minutes to figure out why all the posts on AndrewTalk had no author links. As far as I can tell, nearly all the posts were stolen from other blogs, including mine! On August 10th, AndewTalk posted Check out 5 Requirements For Investing In A New Business. It’s a copy and paste of My Five Requirements For Investing In A New Business. Then there is this post which is a copy and paste of Make $100 With A Citibank Saving Account

Andrew puts the disclaimer “This post was inspired from JhonChow.com.” on the two posts he took from my blog. Not only did Andrew misspelled my name but the correct disclaimer should be, “This post was stolen from JohnChow.com.” Andrew didn’t put any disclaimer on the other posts he stole. I recommend you check his blog to see if he ripped any posts from you. From doing a Google quote search, I can see that Andrew ripped a bunch of the posts from Search Engine Optimization Journal. Other posts looks to be taken from free article services but the resource box was removed.

The only original posts on AndrewTalk is his first post and the post asking readers to suggest a topic for him to write about. I suggest, “How to make yourself look like a fool by paying $400 for a review from a blog that you stole content from.”

This Is Not 1999

If Andrew really owns a web design and programming company then surely he must have an understanding of copyright laws. Furthermore, you would think he would also know that white text on a black background went out of style in 1999. The blog violates every design rules you can think of. Where is the home page link?

I really don’t know what Andrew was thinking when he ordered this review, but since he did, I recommend he remove all stolen articles from his blog or the $400 he paid for this review will seem like peanuts once the owners of those websites he stole content from gets done with him.

Guy creates a blog with stolen content and then orders a review from a blog that he stole content from. Try and figure that one out.

Did you enjoy this post? Get John Chow Dot Com updates via email...

Stay up to date with all of John Chow’s tips for making money online and blog posts by subscribing via email. Your email will be kept private and never shared with anyone.

Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Well, AndrewTalk is back. Here is the official apology: http://andrewtalk.com/2007/08/17/the-big-comeback-...

Hi John,

I complete agree with you. There is blog called
www.plannerlife.info.

This guy is copying entire stuff from my blog.

http://analogstuff.blogspot.com

I dont know how to avoid that. Do u have any suggestions.

Regards,
analogstuff

It's been suggested already, but what if AndrewTalk had this planned all along? I don't believe Andrew to be that stupid, so it seems the most likely idea to me. What if he deliberately made his site look bad, stolen a bunch of articles, in order to be bashed in his JohnChow review?

I mean I'm talking from my own experience here, but the fact the review was so negative is the only reason that *I* visited the guy's site. I'm sure that of all the people that visited, some will be checking his webpage a few more times in the upcoming week, just to see if his "new content" is actually worth it. Most of them won't, but some of them will. So this guy basically got a sh**load of new readers overnight. Talk about instant fame.

The question is: if this theory is true, was $400 worth it?

This all goes beyond Johns blog now too. Look at all the pingbacks.

I am amazed the amount of traffic Andrew has received as a result of this post.

Seriously there is no such thing as bad PR. He should place some ads on those pages and moentize the traffic a bit. Also leave a RSS feed and email alert for visitors to be notified in the future.

So the lesson is that if you write a horrible blog, you can get huge amount of traffic ;-)

Abhishek

:shock:

Oh God, the first thing I did after read this review was change my Wordpress theme (it was white text over black background) :oops:

John, let me tell you, your blog and knowledge has been the pilar of the mine (that begin this month), and just yesterday found the Misty theme, almost by accident.

All of you here actually fell inside of a buzz marketing trap although it seems this was done by default by the owner of the blog in question.

John Chow dot Com is an influential authority in its own right so doing an interview especially a not so positive one will definitely send hundreds of visitors to the blog anyway and this is eveident by the nearly two hundred responses to the post John made, how gullible we all can be at times.

My question is to John and I would wish he replies directly to this question:

Did you perform a due diligence check on the review applicant before accepting to write the review?

It's obvious that you're pissing rocks over the ripped off content ina number of the posts made on this blog but the blog has already achieved its aim from you exposure your ranting has given to the andrewtalk blog.

But then again there are so mny free to publish content available online today I'm surprised that word for word articles are being used to populate the average don't have the time to write it myself blogger out there.

Ouch 400 dollars down the drain, but I guess this is good for john's rep as it proves he doesnt push crappy sites just cause they pay him.

400 dollars down the drain my a$$. Look how much traffic he's gotten, and the comments keep coming. 422 people have voted on his poll. Who knows how many people have visited.... Maybe he's a complete doofus, but I doubt it. It was probably planned out to go exactly like it has.

Note to self...come up with a blog that will absolutely get horrible review, pay for a review by a top blog, then move to stage 2 of the plan.

I just went back and read the post on Michael Nivola. That was almost as good as this one.

too bad he'll still get the john chow effect. Well, not from me, I'm not gonna give andrew talk any of my my traffic.

i always support chow, welcome to www.sodoii.com if you are looking for girl friends.

I tried to goto his blog and found this:

"I will prove the world that this is not a junk blog. I will re-make all the posts and all de the designing.

After this I will ask the world what they think about AndrewTalk."

... heh.

this guy will certainly feel the john chow effect lol

I don't see any good coming from this.

"No such thing as bad press" maybe? But still... hmm.

You should do a little checking on his whois information. Check the guy's address in the whois..., it will take you to some interesting information... I already emailed John with the stuff...

I've set up a website to expose this plagiarism artist. Check it out

:twisted:

Nice way to point out a youtube very old video ..

Added: November 27, 2006
From: TheFishman75
Information
Rick Astley's debut single...

Very interesting. I would love to hear of the outcome after everyone finds out he has stolen their material....
Best of luck to you with that one.

kcdc627
:smile:

That's Hilarious. Maybe paying for a review was his way of paying you back for all the money he made off your content. I wonder if he is paying back everyone in this manner ;-)

Interesting, we have a similar issue going on. But they didn't pay us $400 to find it:(

Funniest thing i've read so far today! God bless the internet!

I guess I stand alone. Stolen content or not, I think it was classless to accept the review fee and trash the guy.

You could have accomplished the same thing without taking his money.

You are not the only one.

I also said is highly imoral, yet JC bother to answer :
is not imoral, is ... evil ..

LOL.

Pathetic excuse to grab 400$ coming from a guy pretending to have ~15,000$ a month online income ..

Everyone knows that reviews do not have to be positive. Advertisers take that risk. Guy orders a review, guy got a review. What is classless or immoral about it?

IMO, there's nothing immoral about giving an accurate review of a site. They paid for a review--that's what they got. I think it's WAY more immoral to give a positive review of a site or product that sucks just to collect a fee...which seems to be standard operating procedure for the vast majority of bloggers out there that do pay per post type programs. Not to mention the fact that Andrew (assuming John /= "Andrew") may have gotten exactly what he was looking for out of this.

Maybe he was trying to linkbait... will be awesome cause I'm sure others are blogging about this as we speak. :shock:

Btw, his domain are very easy to remember imo :???:

Wow: Andrew finally got wind you were so ticked and stopped by to comment. Hilarious!

Anyway, thanks for the backlink, John! By the way, admiring your ebook was part of the reason I finally put out my own.

Mine, however, is a memoir. Lots of strange and funny stories from my youth (e.g., ghost sightings, elementary school cross-dressers)...

Regards,

Viqi French
http://squidoo.com/daddysgonnabuy

I dont think no one would just waste $400 for no reason. It's a lot of money. I think this was a well thought out plan from Andrew's part and if that's the case then I must say that he is a VERY smart person.

C'mon John, own up. This is really your nobody blog and you're using John Chow dot Com for some free publicity. :lol:

now that's beyond evil :)

that's exactly what I think too

Damn, this is really funny. :grin:

This guy is screwed.

People keep getting dumb err... smarter each day :lol:

I can't believe this guy is so stupid. I just checked his website and he setup a poll where he asks if he still has a chance to recover.

I don't know if this guy is really stupid or naive.

First of all, excuse my english (I´m Portuguese) :mrgreen:

Recently I´ve launch the site AdMiNTEC.net (a place for people to discover and share content about "Making Money Online").

This site links to many of the top blogs about it, like jonhchow.com and problogger.net, and many more... All sources are identified and in the footer of all pages I put this disclaimer:

AdMiNTEC.net is neither affiliated with the authors of this stories nor responsible for its content. AdMiNTEC.net does not claim ownership rights to the stories, which are instead held by the sites to which this Service links. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. AdMiNTEC.net is a place for people to discover and share content about "Making Money Online".

Is my site violating any copyright rights? What do you think about it?

Thank´s for your help.

Linking to the original post is not a copyright violation. You can even use a quote or two from the article to help explain things to your readers. However, posting the entire article without permission is a copyright violation. You look to be OK.

A typical good format when linking to other content is:

John Chow recently wrote:
"AndrewTalk is a good example on how not to do a blog. After reading this, you’ll understand why and you’ll also wonder what Andrew was thinking by order this review."

Check it out over at:
http://www.johnchow.com/andrewtalk-how-not-to-do-a...

why not title this website andrewstolencontent.com huh? As a matter of fact is this blogging is acting as a rferral point for other blog content then maybe using th trackback permalink witha brief intro to the post wouldn't be so bad huh.

I seriously wonder what type of review he thought he might get with all his stolen content :roll: . I am glad that regardless of the money he paid you provided honest information about the site. That must have been a bit frustrating to find your own work compy and pasted.

Cheers!

LOL hahhahhahhaha, $400 well spent.

I just want to apologize to JohnChow.com and encourage everyone to check out my NEW blog (now live!) with articles and content I can be proud of.

Nice use of tinyurl there, buddy. Like, why do you even bother?

Hey guys, just wanted to apologize to everyone and encourage you all to check out the improvements I've made to my NEW blog.

I think you will see that I'm NOT just some scam artist. I've got great articles and advice.

What an idiot!

I'm glad that you caught him. I just confronted someone for pasting my content on their website (they have their own domain). They have it monetized with Yahoo's Publishing Network. Check this out. Everytime I write a post, this person has some type of feed that automatically posts my content on their site. It gets better. I have a problem with Technorati not updating my posts immediately. Every time I post, I have to ping with the suffix index.html. Meanwhile, my post appears on their site instantly. So guess what happens? It looks like I'm posting duplicate content! I went as far as offering to blog for them for pay, if they were too lazy to post themsleves. Never got a reply. Hhmm, it's just easier to copy and paste. By the way, you guys might want to check the site. It has lots of content from many different authors. I refuse to give them free advertising. So if you want to see if they have your content, contact me on my blog.

Geez, I blog to support myself and my 7 kids. You would think they would have some consideration. I'm tired of lazy people scamming those of us that work!

I'm glad that you got him and his $400.00. Think of it this way, you got $200.00 for the content he stole!
:twisted:

at least he got a free review

This is the funniest sponsored review of the year