DISCOVER 'RFS' 100% AUTOMATED SYSTEM EARN $5000 WITH A LAPTOP
 




Get Reviewed by this Blog for only $500
DealDotComTTZ MediaGoogle Adsense
Pepperjam NetworkBidvertiser
Text Link AdsKonterra

The Richter Scales, creators of Here’s Comes Another Bubble had their bubble burst by a photographer who got upset because the video used one of her images.

Lane Hartwell, the photographer who took one of the pictures that was included in the video, complained that she wasn’t paid for her work. She hired a lawyer, who sent YouTube a DMCA notice and forced YouTube to take the video down. At the time the video was removed, it was coming up on 700,000 views. TechCrunch’s view on this is Hartwell claims wouldn’t stand up in a copyright fight.

I spoke with a copyright attorney this afternoon and described the facts to him. He confirmed my thoughts on the matter. Copyright is a structure around prohibitions, not permissions, he says. That means it lays out rules for things people cannot do with your work - it does not give you the right to demand permission before any use is made.

The Richter Scale video was almost certainly fair use of the photo. A court would look at a variety of factors in making the determination. Among those factors, a court would decide if the use is likely to adversely affect the incentives of others to create copyrighted works, and whether their decision one way or another would tend promote the progress of science and the useful arts. In this case, the inclusion of the photo in a parody work would almost certainly be held by a court to be fair use, the attorney said.

You can read more about the story at Wired, where Lane Hartwell is a frequent contributor. The only thing I have to say about this is, what a party pooper!

While YouTube may have taken down the video, it’s already spreading to other video sharing sites. I have a feeling Hartwell’s lawyer is going to be really busy sending out DMCA notices. In the end, all she’s going to get is a big lawyer bill and the video will still be on the Net (it’s call viral marketing for a reason). For those who haven’t seen the video, here it is. Enjoy before they take it down!

Find out what I am doing right now by following me on Twitter! If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.

Make Money Online with John Chow's Ad Network - Join TTZ Media Now!
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (10 votes, average: 3.7 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here's A Few More Related Posts

  • Here Comes Another Bubble
  • Are We In Another Internet Bubble?
  • Dot Com Bubble 2.0
  • Cheap-Ass Dining At Hon’s Wun Tun House
  • The Greater Fool Theory

    RSS feed | Trackback URI

    76 Comments »

    Comment by Can't Get Rich
    2007-12-15 20:55:07
    MyAvatars 0.2

    This is why watermarking was invented.

    Comment by BuzzBop.com
    2007-12-15 21:15:08
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Oh, yeah, we’re definitely in “Web Bubble 2.0″ and we’ll be here for a year or so. Perhaps this will be a more cautious bubble. Maybe not.
    There’s still opportunity here, but it will be the savvy ones, the ones with a historical perspective, that will do well.

    When there’s a gold rush, its the folks who see the bigger picture who make the gold…

    Comment by Free Blogroll Link
    2007-12-17 20:30:04
    MyAvatars 0.2

    This is why residual commission rocks so much.

     
     
    Comment by Chris Jacobson
    2007-12-15 21:24:28
    MyAvatars 0.2

    No kidding. I was wondering where that video went… now I know.

    And thanks John for posting it again. Nice touch. :mrgreen:

    Lane Hartwell on the other hand… I don’t know her, but I already don’t like her. Someone needs to lighten up.

    Comment by Steven
    2007-12-15 22:36:39
    MyAvatars 0.2

    They should make a parody video on lawsuits in the US and how she’d get fuxored over by the lawyer bill LOL

    Comment by SEO Optimization
    2007-12-16 12:27:25
    MyAvatars 0.2

    ROFL that will definitively make yet another big bubble buzz lmao. I wonder how would she really feel after that?

    After all, what does she requires to be paid off? Because she clicked SNAP while he was smiling and she even published it on the net without watermark.

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
    Comment by Affiliate Unleashed
    2007-12-16 20:48:51
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Yea! LOL. It made me smile that he posted it again. HAHAHA.

     
    Comment by Free Blogroll Link
    2007-12-17 20:30:34
    MyAvatars 0.2

    She’s probably just trying to get some cash out of someone else’s success.

     
     
    2007-12-16 02:42:15
    MyAvatars 0.2

    This is one great video :P it has viral written on all over!

    Comment by Nicholas James
    2007-12-16 12:16:07
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Guess the woman who wants to sue them…doesn’t consider the massive free promotion shes receiving :!:

    Comment by Affiliate Unleashed
    2007-12-16 20:50:14
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Not really. She’s received no mention or anything till she complained.

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
     
    Comment by Robert
    2007-12-16 06:29:25
    MyAvatars 0.2

    It would have better all around if an arrangement had been agreed upon. Now only the lawyer benefits.

    Comment by Free Blogroll Link
    2007-12-17 20:33:57
    MyAvatars 0.2

    As someone who plans on law as a career choice (I’m still in high-school)…that’s good. :mrgreen:

     
     
    Comment by Etienne Teo
    2007-12-16 18:43:45
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Putting 2 hands on the table to say that is right.

     
     
    Comment by MoneyNing
    2007-12-15 21:28:03
    MyAvatars 0.2

    That was a great video and I hope that it spreads. It’s unfortunate that only the lawyer would benefit in this case where no one else wins (as usual).

    Comment by max
    2007-12-15 22:57:02
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I think the video will spread virally because of the lawyers and all this crap happening. These guys might get on the news soon! :)

    Comment by John Chow Graphs
    2007-12-16 07:03:24
    MyAvatars 0.2

    700k views already? I’m pretty sure it’s already spread virally.

    Comment by Etienne Teo
    2007-12-16 18:45:01
    MyAvatars 0.2

    That is pretty normal when techcrunch post,the videos soars.

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
    Comment by Nicholas James
    2007-12-16 12:19:47
    MyAvatars 0.2

    It already spread virally :wink: it was in techcrunch

     
     
     
    Comment by Adrian Keys
    2007-12-15 21:33:04
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Lane could not have done Richter Scales a better favor. Yes the suit will be an annoyance, but if the video was popular before…the sky is now the limit.
    I can hear the viral cranking as I write.

    Comment by Free Blogroll Link
    2007-12-17 20:31:45
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I was just thinking. There’s no publicity like any publicity. ;-)

     
     
    Comment by Phamen
    2007-12-15 21:35:07
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Let’s wait the result.

     
    Comment by Shaun Carter
    2007-12-15 21:48:48
    MyAvatars 0.2

    That’s a great video, I’m really not sure which rock I’ve been hiding under to have not seen it before today. The fact that the photographer is demanding payment for a picture that does not look professional is pretty sad.

    Here’s a thought… if you put it up on the Internet, someone is bound to use it and not pay you!

     
    Comment by BrannRay
    2007-12-15 21:59:25
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Honestly, I think the video is brilliant. And all Lane Hartwell is doing is creating more publicity for the video. It’s not going to do her any good to try and sue for the money for one picture in the video, because in the end the lawyer bills are going to cost way more than what she’d get paid anyway! I bet the guys at richterscales.com are loving this, because it’s causing the video to go viral! So good for them! :)

    2007-12-16 02:44:23
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I don’t even think she’d win!

    How did she notice the picture in all that confusion.

    Comment by BrannRay
    2007-12-16 11:18:50
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I don’t think she’d win either lol And I have no idea how she found it! It’s like she had to be looking for it already!

     
     
     
    Comment by Darron Beetge
    2007-12-15 21:59:26
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Wow, great video. I hope that Daily Motion doesn’t crumble as easy as YouTube on this.

     
    Comment by rodel
    2007-12-15 22:00:20
    MyAvatars 0.2

    can i use this video as well for FREE? :mrgreen: great video.. ford compared to facebook? not bad.. :twisted:

     
    Comment by InvestorBlogger Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-12-15 22:38:34
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Unfortunately, she’s just GUARANTEED that 700K views will double, and that resilient bloggers etc… will just reupload the video again and again… Heck… you could even host it on a site outside of the US…

    Let her use a lawyer in another country!

    Kenneth

    Comment by max
    2007-12-15 22:58:10
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I remember when this video first came out, it was only at like 1600 views. It has spead virally….yes, if you post it on an international video site, you might be okay….

     
     
    Comment by Jason Heath
    2007-12-15 22:59:03
    MyAvatars 0.2

    This video is awesome! What a whiny, litigious society we live in, that this one brief photo can trigger a take down notice. Ridiculous.

     
    Comment by Dan
    2007-12-15 23:19:47
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Sounds like a setup… like you said the other day… there’s no bad press.

     
    Comment by GradeMoney.com
    2007-12-15 23:21:14
    MyAvatars 0.2

    :shock: I love this video!

     
    2007-12-15 23:50:24
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Remember, There Really Is No Such Thing As Bad Press. Lane Hartwell needs to get over it. There’s something called fair use. Besides we need new rules, because this is a completely new era.

     
    Comment by Persuasion
    2007-12-16 00:07:50
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Good press, bad press… makes no difference. It drives traffic. Especially the latter!

    Comment by Affiliate Unleashed
    2007-12-16 20:51:26
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Yup. Good point. But now I think that person is pretty lame for filing.

    Meh.

     
     
    Comment by ArahMan7 Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-12-16 00:57:43
    MyAvatars 0.2

    It make me wonder, what John Chow gonna do if his picture were on the video? Sue? :roll:

    Greetings and lotta loves from Malaysia.

    2007-12-16 02:52:53
    MyAvatars 0.2

    LoL why not wait for the big guy to come over and tell us what he would have done :P

    LoL I’m sure he wouldn’t, he loves his pictures being taking and published all over the net and on the front page of a lot of magazines :P

     
    Comment by Joel Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-12-16 07:49:27
    MyAvatars 0.2

    The 700K would be 1,400K if that’s the case.

     
    Comment by John Chow
    2007-12-16 15:39:25
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I would have loved it if I was in that video. More press for me! :twisted:

    Comment by Joel Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-12-16 18:32:14
    MyAvatars 0.2

    That separates the entrepreneurial spirits :idea: from the greedy spirits :evil:

     
    Comment by ArahMan7 Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-12-16 22:54:13
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Yeah, I thought so too, lol! :wink:

     
     
     
    2007-12-16 01:15:15
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Hmmm, people like this really annoy me. They get all worked up about something that really doesn’t matter.

    ~ Dave

     
    Comment by m07
    2007-12-16 03:54:09
    MyAvatars 0.2

    gr8 video.keep up the good work.

     
    2007-12-16 04:26:46
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Great video hehe, good work

     
    2007-12-16 04:41:19
    MyAvatars 0.2

    More importantly, there really could be a 2.0 bubble burst. Facebook being nearly as high valued as Ford, does that make sense?

    Comment by ram
    2007-12-16 15:40:19
    MyAvatars 0.2

    who’s buying Ford these days?

    2007-12-16 19:08:01
    MyAvatars 0.2

    True, but how is Facebook generating revenue besides a trickle of advertising?

    Comment by Free Blogroll Link
    2007-12-17 20:33:09
    MyAvatars 0.2

    “Trickle” is not quite the word I was thinking of. ;-p

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
     
    Comment by InvestorBlogger Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-12-16 21:05:21
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Actually it says a lot more about what Ford is NOT doing… and that is making a profit/good cars/people happy. In some ways, while facebook is creating value, ford is destroying value.

    Kenneth

    2007-12-17 15:18:35
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Maybe Ford should start a social network and a blog.

     
     
     
    Comment by John Chow Graphs
    2007-12-16 07:08:47
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Yeah, hi, I’m from Ford Motor Company’s legal department.

    John, I demand you take that video down instantly because of the use of our copyrighted logo.

    The DMCA is in the mail.

     
    Comment by Neil Dobbins
    2007-12-16 07:16:09
    MyAvatars 0.2

    This is ridiculous. I can’t believe somebody could be so anal to actually to claim the rights used to a single photo in this video. It’s amazing how money hungry some people can be….

     
    2007-12-16 07:22:16
    MyAvatars 0.2

    [...] Originally Posted by jmenq2 I don’t think so. I think that it is considered fair use, an exception to copyright protection. The site’s terms of service have nothing to do with it. Thanks J. I think it’s considered fair use, too - much like this situtation: Bubble Burst for Here’s Comes Another Bubble | John Chow dot Com [...]