<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If You Thought You Saw Google Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2784</guid>
		<description>The Theme is call MistyLook. You can get it here: http://wpthemes.info/misty-look/

Stephen - If you say stick with the inline placement, then why the hell do you have a huge 728 at the top? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Theme is call MistyLook. You can get it here: <a href="http://wpthemes.info/misty-look/" rel="nofollow">http://wpthemes.info/misty-look/</a></p>
<p>Stephen - If you say stick with the inline placement, then why the hell do you have a huge 728 at the top? <img src='http://www.johnchow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christoph</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>Christoph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>The new template looks good. Is that a custom design?

Christoph</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new template looks good. Is that a custom design?</p>
<p>Christoph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>You should stick to the inline placements.  Anything else has become a waste of time:

http://www.stephenfung.net/index.php/inline-ads-rule/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should stick to the inline placements.  Anything else has become a waste of time:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stephenfung.net/index.php/inline-ads-rule/" rel="nofollow">http://www.stephenfung.net/index.php/inline-ads-rule/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>OK, I have turn the AdSense on for now. I'll let it run a few days to get an idea of performance and then project how much more it will make in Q4. Then based on those findings, I'll decided if they should stay. 

Actually, turning on the ads now will get them ready for Q4. If you look around on some of the post, you'll see blank ads because Google hasn't spider the information yet. It can take up to a few days for that to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I have turn the AdSense on for now. I&#8217;ll let it run a few days to get an idea of performance and then project how much more it will make in Q4. Then based on those findings, I&#8217;ll decided if they should stay. </p>
<p>Actually, turning on the ads now will get them ready for Q4. If you look around on some of the post, you&#8217;ll see blank ads because Google hasn&#8217;t spider the information yet. It can take up to a few days for that to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>hey Carl
Your blog is really cool and i check it often but you lack updates start updating like john does daily and your traffic will grow then you can warrent those google ads!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Carl<br />
Your blog is really cool and i check it often but you lack updates start updating like john does daily and your traffic will grow then you can warrent those google ads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2771</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2771</guid>
		<description>Google ads don't bother me one bit ... just please don't start doing the obnoxious paid plugging =/
http://www.mattcoddington.com/?p=12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google ads don&#8217;t bother me one bit &#8230; just please don&#8217;t start doing the obnoxious paid plugging =/<br />
<a href="http://www.mattcoddington.com/?p=12" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcoddington.com/?p=12</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2763</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2763</guid>
		<description>You can go ahead and put them on if it were my choice :) I am that used to seeing ads around the internet that a site with them doesnt phase me or make me want to go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can go ahead and put them on if it were my choice <img src='http://www.johnchow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I am that used to seeing ads around the internet that a site with them doesnt phase me or make me want to go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2752</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2752</guid>
		<description>They don't look too bad to me. Personally, I would probably prefer them off, but it's not like we're discussing IntelliTXT here...

I think their value in terms of the experiment could well exceed any cash value. However, I would personally would think of a cut-off point ie a value they should exceed in order to justify their existence. If they're worth $500 a month or something, and you can use that to directly cover your diaper budget then go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t look too bad to me. Personally, I would probably prefer them off, but it&#8217;s not like we&#8217;re discussing IntelliTXT here&#8230;</p>
<p>I think their value in terms of the experiment could well exceed any cash value. However, I would personally would think of a cut-off point ie a value they should exceed in order to justify their existence. If they&#8217;re worth $500 a month or something, and you can use that to directly cover your diaper budget then go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/if-thought-you-saw-google-ads/#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>You'd be crazy not to. Your site comes up a lot in many high paying search phrases (mortages, investing, etc) and you probably have enough traffic to warrant it.

Unlike personal blogs like mine, it wouldn't be a total waste, and probably worth doing.

One more passenger on the MONEY TRAIN!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d be crazy not to. Your site comes up a lot in many high paying search phrases (mortages, investing, etc) and you probably have enough traffic to warrant it.</p>
<p>Unlike personal blogs like mine, it wouldn&#8217;t be a total waste, and probably worth doing.</p>
<p>One more passenger on the MONEY TRAIN!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
