Stunning product. Superb system. Rockin residuals.
 




Get Reviewed by this Blog for only $500
DealDotComTTZ MediaGoogle Adsense
Pepperjam NetworkBidvertiser
Text Link AdsKonterra

When I made the decision to monetize John Chow dot Com nine months ago, I know that I would use the blog to push the limits of what was possible. The blog was to be used as a case study so others can learn from its success and failures.

Pushing the limits of blog monetization almost means pushing Google to the edge. There are many who will say that playing with Google is like playing with fire - sooner or later, you’re going to get burn. It seems that once again, I am in a Google penalty box. Not only am I no longer on page one for the search term, make money online, but I am no longer page one for my own name.

The number one theory for the penalty is I overdid the linkback promotion. Whatever the reason, it doesn’t really matter. The make money online search term was sending me about 150 visitors per day. As for the John Chow search term, the first ten pages of results all link to JohnChow.com, so the searcher will find me indirectly. That actually benefits bloggers who did a review of my blog.

Live By The Google, Die By The Google

This a good time to remind everyone that if you live by the Google, you’ll die by the Google. I do not depend on Google for my traffic and neither should you. Thousands of people have this blog bookmarked and nearly 6,000 read it by RSS. Way too many webmaster put too much time and effort into Google to try and gain a number one ranking. Google doesn’t stand still (they can’t afford to). They are always tweaking their search system so the chance of holding a number one spot forever is next to zero.

You should work on getting Google traffic for your blog, but you shouldn’t do it the exclusion of everything else. If all your traffic is coming from Google, then you need to work on getting other traffic sources. You are in a very scary situation. It’s like having all your blog income generated by AdSense. If that’s all I did, this blog would make only $1,000 a month instead of $10,000. Don’t put all your traffic eggs in one basket.

I am 100% positive that Google will eventually restore my number one ranking for my name. Right now, they look pretty stupid. Do a search for John Chow and you’ll get page after page of sites talking about JohnChow.com, but JohnChow.com isn’t the number one result.

Let’s see, I’ve been banned from Digg, banned from Technorati and now bitch slapped by Google. I’m doing pretty good! :twisted:

Find out what I am doing right now by following me on Twitter! If you like this post then please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.

Make Money Online with John Chow's Ad Network - Join TTZ Media Now!
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (22 votes, average: 3.55 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Here's A Few More Related Posts

  • Someday Never Comes
  • I Thought My Visa Balance Was Kind A Low
  • New Blog Milestone - 7000 RSS Readers
  • Digg Lighting Strikes Twice
  • My Biggest Online Income Killer

    RSS feed | Trackback URI

    180 Comments »

    Comment by
    2007-06-28 19:08:54
    MyAvatars 0.2

    i am first. :D

    Comment by Mubin
    2007-06-28 19:14:47
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Not really first if you dont have a link back to your site, so kinda pointless.

    Hey John, look out for Alexa and feedburner next, that would be a biatch…

    BUt seriously your not banned from technorati, just disliked I guess.

    Comment by John Chow
    2007-06-28 21:17:37
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I was banned for a while. It was during that time when I pinged the hell out of out them. :twisted:

    Comment by Ankur
    2007-06-28 22:14:19
    MyAvatars 0.2

    You cant blame technorati …. their ass got burned with your evil ping’s!!! HAHAHA!

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
    Comment by Eastwood
    2007-06-29 00:06:57
    MyAvatars 0.2

    will you still publish the already submitted johnchow.com review batches?

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
    Comment by Philomena Ojikutu
    2007-06-29 01:42:58
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Live by Google florish by the people!

    Cumulative visitors to any blog would naturally stick by your blog if the menu is nourishing enough.

    There is no reason for any ingenious blogger to die by Google because, the multitude that had come by Google and stuck with you don’t need Google again to keep sticking with you.

    You can’t minimize the impact of a serch engine that brings 80% of all your organic SE traffic.

    Like John already said, the Google tweaking is only but temporary for a brief season.

    You can’t do anything against the truth but for the truth!

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
    Comment by Jarle
    2007-06-29 02:13:17
    MyAvatars 0.2

    What would be the worst site you could be banned from?

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
    Comment by A video a day
    2007-06-29 03:21:01
    MyAvatars 0.2

    i thought so. thanks for letting us lot know.

    when will google do the next pagerank update?

    anyone?

     
    Comment by A video a day
    2007-06-29 03:29:54
    MyAvatars 0.2

    john, i just did a search on the term “john chow”, funnily enough, johnchow.net is ranked well above johnchow.com, and it’s simply wrong, but then again, you were gaming with google on and you get a slap on the wrist….

     
     
     
    Comment by Marc
    2007-06-29 07:12:30
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I’ve never heard of anyone getting banned from Alexa. I imagine you’d really have to go way overboard to have them even notice you.

    Comment by MrGPT
    2007-06-29 13:14:37
    MyAvatars 0.2

    JohnChow: The evil man who got banned from every search engine.

    How’s that title John ;) ?

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
     
     
    2007-06-28 19:10:16
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I was wondering when you’d post something about this :) Did you call Google up to find out what happened, or did you just do some looking around and guess that the linkback promotion is what did it? I’m very curious to know.

    James

    Comment by Ankur
    2007-06-28 22:16:01
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I doubt google can do anything …. its all an automated algorithm which i suppose very few people can edit. Larry and Page are also :twisted:

    Comment by Lewis Empire
    2007-06-28 23:28:04
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Google may be automated but they sure can drop a ranking in a hurry if they feel like it. There was a recent court case (which Google won) about their page ranks and displaying a URL ina search.

     
    Comment by ritchie
    2007-06-28 23:28:38
    MyAvatars 0.2

    that’s what they say, but there’s plenty evidence that there are manual tweaks.

    Comment by Philomena Ojikutu
    2007-06-29 01:48:04
    MyAvatars 0.2

    The best of robobts cannot out-perfom the capacity of the human brain, that is why there is always a need by Google for manual tweaking now and then.

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
    Comment by Marc
    2007-06-29 07:16:41
    MyAvatars 0.2

    What’s often perceived as manual tweaks are much more likely to be specialized filters. They look like manual tweaks since they many either only affect one segment, or only one site or two across many segments.

    They can’t manually tweak, it simply does not scale.

     
     
     
    Comment by blogcrowds
    2007-06-29 07:10:45
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Well then they better fix the algorithm, if this become more widespread people will stop using google.

    By the way, Larry and Page are the same person.

    Larry Page & Sergey Brin

    Comment by Marc
    2007-06-29 07:14:37
    MyAvatars 0.2

    This is just a minor blip. Besides even if it wasn’t, so long as most of the queries return good results, the masses won’t care that John’s not ranking for his name. This type of thing has happened before and will happen again. In the intervening period, they’re pulling in over a billion a quarter :P

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
     
     
    Comment by ken
    2007-06-28 19:14:05
    MyAvatars 0.2

    test. did my comments show up.

    Comment by ken
    2007-06-28 19:16:11
    MyAvatars 0.2

    sorry guys, I was testing out something. I just notice that if I put my name as * m o n e y * word in it, it’s didn’t show up. I guess this is john comments spam filter working behind the scene.

    Comment by Jarle
    2007-06-29 02:14:47
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I have also tried other names and have come to the same conclusion.

     
     
     
    Comment by Ed Lau
    2007-06-28 19:18:21
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I told you it would eventually come back to bite you in the ass.

    Comment by shaun
    2007-06-29 09:52:30
    MyAvatars 0.2

    john has always said don’t always rely on google, nobody really warned him he always knew this was a possible outcome.

    Comment by SEO Blog
    2007-06-29 10:04:46
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I’m pretty sure he meant the reciprocal linking review scheme, not relying on Google.

     
     
     
    Comment by gaman
    2007-06-28 19:20:43
    MyAvatars 0.2

    What a coincident. I just noticed that yesterday.

     
    Comment by webd360
    2007-06-28 19:21:08
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Don’t worry, you still have your loyal readers and you’ll still get traffic through all of us who recommend your site to others. You’ll probably get back the number one spot for your name soon too, since it is your domain too.

    Comment by Ankur
    2007-06-28 22:17:54
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Google will get screwed if they dont put the right site (JC Dot Com) in the first place for John Chow.

    Dont worry, they are bound by their own rules :mrgreen:

    Comment by SEO Blog
    2007-06-29 10:06:40
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Um, no they wont. When a site is trying to game them why would they be bound to return it as a result? Site’s get banned and penalized all the time. The best way for John to get back in their good graces would be to kill off all the review posts and submit a reinclusion request.

    Comment by Hamlet Batista Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-06-29 11:08:01
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I agree. I would stop the paid links as well, but that would depend on whether the money he makes from them is worth the rankings( assuming he gets them back).

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
    Comment by SEO Blog
    2007-06-29 11:19:13
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Just from the math you posted about earlier (the value of those make money online clicks) I would think it would be worth it to stop the paid links. Also, he wouldn’t have to stop completely, just keep it on the DL when doing it.

     
     
     
     
    2007-06-29 07:08:36
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I found JC through someone other site, not Google. Your traffic is definitely coming from all sorts of places, John.

     
     
    Comment by Warren Buffett
    2007-06-28 19:21:22
    MyAvatars 0.2

    So, does that mean you are going to stop those batches?

    Comment by John Chow
    2007-06-28 21:18:33
    MyAvatars 0.2

    No, but it means another rule change is coming.

    Comment by Ankur
    2007-06-28 22:18:37
    MyAvatars 0.2

    HAHAHA!! YOU ARE SOO :twisted: JOHN …. KEEP GOING!!

    Comment by SEO Blog
    2007-06-29 11:02:14
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Good grief… you’ve got a whole mess of brown on your nose mate. :roll:

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
    Comment by simon
    2007-06-28 23:20:17
    MyAvatars 0.2

    So what would that be?

     
    Comment by A video a day
    2007-06-29 03:25:01
    MyAvatars 0.2

    yes, please let us know asap.

     
    2007-06-29 07:09:40
    MyAvatars 0.2

    What happens to the entries that have been submitted thus far?

     
    Comment by Hamlet Batista Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-06-29 10:09:42
    MyAvatars 0.2

    John,

    At this point it doesn’t really matter if you change your rules. Like you did (per my advise) when you started to mix your incoming link anchor text.

    Your link back campaign became so popular that it got to Google ears, or someone (Michael Nivola?) reported you. The bottom line is that you are in their radar. They don’t like their rankings to be manipulated.

    Being an old SEO dog, I’ve had many of my affiliate sites banned or dropped for key terms. That is why I did not participate in your link back promotion.

    For those that are copying John’s strategy now is a good time to fold your flags.

     
     
     
    Comment by Wahlau.NET
    2007-06-28 19:45:49
    MyAvatars 0.2

    yup..it is sad to not have your own name appearing on google…

    I think it will come back

     
    Comment by Shaun Carter
    2007-06-28 19:57:00
    MyAvatars 0.2

    “Let’s see, I’ve been banned from Digg, banned from Technorati and now bitch slapped by Google. I’m doing pretty good! :twisted:”

    And you still make $10,000 a month… amazing!

    Comment by Ankur
    2007-06-28 22:19:33
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Agloco is yet not added!!

    Comment by Marc
    2007-06-29 07:19:14
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Agloco will be a one-time cash-out (unless John wants to hold on to stock). You earn shares of the company rather than money this time around.

     
     
     
    Comment by MoneyFromHome
    2007-06-28 20:08:31
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I don´t think its you in particular. I have a few sites that are number 1 on Google one day and then number 30 or 40 the next! Cann´t figure them out!

    Comment by Bruno Martins Subscribed to comments via email
    2007-06-29 02:16:46
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Same thing to me, it drives me nuts when my sites don’t show up in first page.

     
     
    Comment by Joey
    2007-06-28 20:12:23
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I noticed that Text Lind Ads dropped in the serps too. I was looking for them yesterday and if it weren’t for their paid listing they would not have been on page one.

    It would be nice to know what your traffic numbers are after the drop from google.

    Google is important but since we don’t have control over them we need to work on alternate traffic sources.

    Comment by Ankur
    2007-06-28 22:24:00
    MyAvatars 0.2

    Ya … some evil source like

    Pinging the hell out of feedburner,
    Pinging the hell out of technorati,
    Pinging the hell out of blogsearch,
    Pinging the hell out of yahoosearch,

    Total money > 20k

    Hahaha :lol: :lol:

     
     
    Comment by Terra Andersen
    2007-06-28 20:13:11
    MyAvatars 0.2

    I agree, your page not being ranked #1 for that is lame. I’m sure they’ll correct it soon!

    Comment by soundofgold
    2007-06-29 01:06:31
    MyAvatars 0.2

    It is lame but thats how Google seem to play the game to please….well whoever they need to please (eg. try to ask some Chinese residents about THEIR results of Google searches :???: )

     
     
    Comment by Ulchie
    2007-06-28 20:31:39
    MyAvatars 0.2

    HAHA and your blog still makes more money than many other blogs that are in google, don’t have a technorati penalty and aren’t banned from digg…. not that those three sites alone will give any site success anyways…

    2007-06-29 07:17:17
    MyAvatars 0.2

    John has certainly planted his seeds all this time and now should just worry about reaping all the good stuff. :twisted:

     
     
    Comment by Gdog
    2007-06-28 20:33:30
    MyAvatars 0.2

    That sucks, but those people at Google sure do catch on quickly.

     
    Comment by Hawaii SEO
    2007-06-28 20:39:14
    MyAvatars 0.2

    This could be an interesting case study about “Defensible traffic”.

    For example: I often search your name but only as navigation. I am coming here regardless of your Google listing. I will simply change my method of navigation.

    It would be cool if you were to show how traffic sources shift and the impact it has on overall traffic or not.

     
    Comment by Chris
    2007-06-28 20:40:30