<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Lighting Strikes Twice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/lighting-strikes-twice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/lighting-strikes-twice/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Digg Coup &#171; John Chow dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-11479</link>
		<dc:creator>The Digg Coup &#171; John Chow dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-11479</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s been said many times that Digg users don&#8217;t click on ads so webmasters shouldn&#8217;t brother trying to game the system because they&#8217;ll just end up losing money due to extra bandwidth cost. I can see why this is being said because I&#8217;ve experienced it first hand when this blog received its first few Diggs. You may recall this post: The Tuesday Digg set a new traffic record of over 15,000 page views. That was broken with Wednesday’s Digg, where traffic hit a record 16,500 page views. What does this mean to blog income? Almost nothing! The blog served over 23,000 Google AdSense ads but received only got enough clicks to make $18.96. Now let’s see, that works out to 80 cents eCPM. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s been said many times that Digg users don&#8217;t click on ads so webmasters shouldn&#8217;t brother trying to game the system because they&#8217;ll just end up losing money due to extra bandwidth cost. I can see why this is being said because I&#8217;ve experienced it first hand when this blog received its first few Diggs. You may recall this post: The Tuesday Digg set a new traffic record of over 15,000 page views. That was broken with Wednesday’s Digg, where traffic hit a record 16,500 page views. What does this mean to blog income? Almost nothing! The blog served over 23,000 Google AdSense ads but received only got enough clicks to make $18.96. Now let’s see, that works out to 80 cents eCPM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-3015</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-3015</guid>
		<description>I'm just glad it's not my monthly Google income!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just glad it&#8217;s not my monthly Google income!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-3008</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-3008</guid>
		<description>Hey come on, to some people $20 is their monthly Google income!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey come on, to some people $20 is their monthly Google income!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-2999</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/lighting-strikes-twice/#comment-2999</guid>
		<description>You're breaking all kinds of records this week, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re breaking all kinds of records this week, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
