<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: March Internet Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>My guess is you're on a different Google server. There are times when I've done a link and site search and came up with zero results, only to have different results the next day.

You can try a site like http://www.mypagerank.net/ They have a link popularity checker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is you&#8217;re on a different Google server. There are times when I&#8217;ve done a link and site search and came up with zero results, only to have different results the next day.</p>
<p>You can try a site like <a href="http://www.mypagerank.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mypagerank.net/</a> They have a link popularity checker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Help Desk</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Help Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Still nothing for me.  Obviously it isn't much of a comment but I still wonder why I get no results for either Google link search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still nothing for me.  Obviously it isn&#8217;t much of a comment but I still wonder why I get no results for either Google link search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Not sure about the datacetner bit, but if you enter link:http://www.laptopgamers.com in Google you'll get back 226 results.

Hmm, I see that link:www.laptopgamers.com is also returning 226 results. It was zero when I tried it this morning. Strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure about the datacetner bit, but if you enter link:http://www.laptopgamers.com in Google you&#8217;ll get back 226 results.</p>
<p>Hmm, I see that link:www.laptopgamers.com is also returning 226 results. It was zero when I tried it this morning. Strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Help Desk</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Help Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>John, I'm not sure I get you.  Doing it either way should return the approriate results.  Am I hitting a weird Google datacenter or something?  Perhaps I'm mis-understanding.

When I do the search for ...
  link:www.laptopgamers.com
...on MSN it brings back over 5,000 results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I&#8217;m not sure I get you.  Doing it either way should return the approriate results.  Am I hitting a weird Google datacenter or something?  Perhaps I&#8217;m mis-understanding.</p>
<p>When I do the search for &#8230;<br />
  link:www.laptopgamers.com<br />
&#8230;on MSN it brings back over 5,000 results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>The reason for that is because you type in the parameters wrong. It should be 

link:http://www.digitalgrabber.com
link:http://www.laptopgamers.com

Remember, your browser auto adds http:// to any URL so it must be included in the search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for that is because you type in the parameters wrong. It should be </p>
<p>link:http://www.digitalgrabber.com<br />
link:http://www.laptopgamers.com</p>
<p>Remember, your browser auto adds <a href="http://" rel="nofollow">http://</a> to any URL so it must be included in the search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Help Desk</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Help Desk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-311</guid>
		<description>I was suprised to see Google didn't have any backlinks published for either LapTopGamers.com or DigitalGrabber.com.

link:www.laptopgamers.com
link:www.digitalgrabber.com

Neither of the above 2 Google searches returned anything.

Don't take this as a negative.  This is still a congratulations.  However, how am I supposed to steal your methods unless I can dissect what you are doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was suprised to see Google didn&#8217;t have any backlinks published for either LapTopGamers.com or DigitalGrabber.com.</p>
<p>link:www.laptopgamers.com<br />
link:www.digitalgrabber.com</p>
<p>Neither of the above 2 Google searches returned anything.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t take this as a negative.  This is still a congratulations.  However, how am I supposed to steal your methods unless I can dissect what you are doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>John Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 20:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>It's already tweaked. Remember, a lot of that traffic came from the 60" subwoofer article, which has no targetted shopping links, and semi targetted Google links. It would have been worst if I didn't get a flat CPM for my Vibrant media ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s already tweaked. Remember, a lot of that traffic came from the 60&#8243; subwoofer article, which has no targetted shopping links, and semi targetted Google links. It would have been worst if I didn&#8217;t get a flat CPM for my Vibrant media ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 08:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>You need to find a way to get LG to do more with less.  Time to tweak it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to find a way to get LG to do more with less.  Time to tweak it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/march-internet-results/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 04:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/march-internet-results/#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Congrats on breaking the $1000 mark on Digital Grabber. I don't think it will be long before you make your $2000 goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on breaking the $1000 mark on Digital Grabber. I don&#8217;t think it will be long before you make your $2000 goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
