<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Profitable Ad Network For A Low Traffic Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-24027</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-24027</guid>
		<description>As per David Mackey question above. I am preparing some blog sites and I would like expert thoughts on how niche should a blog be?

One of my sites is about franchise opportunity feedback from satisfied/unsatisfied business owners. Should I have individual sites for for food, automotive, child care, home improvement etc. or just franchise opportunity in general with sub groups?

Experts are welcome to comment. Harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As per David Mackey question above. I am preparing some blog sites and I would like expert thoughts on how niche should a blog be?</p>
<p>One of my sites is about franchise opportunity feedback from satisfied/unsatisfied business owners. Should I have individual sites for for food, automotive, child care, home improvement etc. or just franchise opportunity in general with sub groups?</p>
<p>Experts are welcome to comment. Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salatti.NET &#187; John Chow dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-20065</link>
		<dc:creator>Salatti.NET &#187; John Chow dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-20065</guid>
		<description>[...] Most Profitable Ad Network For A Low Traffic Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most Profitable Ad Network For A Low Traffic Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-16391</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-16391</guid>
		<description>John - I was thinking about driving traffic to my blog and had a quick question for you. I am somewhat of an eclectic personality. I enjoy a wide variety of topics and post on all of them. In my blog I have pre-created the following tags: Books, Christianity, General Technology, Mental Disorders, Movies, Music, Personal Life, Politics, Programming, Science, Youth Ministry and person 10-20 more. I post on each of these topics somewhat regularly. I was wondering - do I need to separate these into separate blogs? I was thinking about it and wondering if people wouldn't subscribe to the blog by RSS or read it regularly b/c it covers too many topics. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John - I was thinking about driving traffic to my blog and had a quick question for you. I am somewhat of an eclectic personality. I enjoy a wide variety of topics and post on all of them. In my blog I have pre-created the following tags: Books, Christianity, General Technology, Mental Disorders, Movies, Music, Personal Life, Politics, Programming, Science, Youth Ministry and person 10-20 more. I post on each of these topics somewhat regularly. I was wondering - do I need to separate these into separate blogs? I was thinking about it and wondering if people wouldn&#8217;t subscribe to the blog by RSS or read it regularly b/c it covers too many topics. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash K. Gilpin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Chow Dot Com - The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Disgruntled Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-15963</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash K. Gilpin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; John Chow Dot Com - The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Disgruntled Webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-15963</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.johnchow.com/category/agloco/ http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/ http://www.johnchow.com/150-into-15000-in-30-days/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.johnchow.com/category/agloco/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnchow.com/category/agloco/</a> <a href="http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/</a> <a href="http://www.johnchow.com/150-into-15000-in-30-days/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnchow.com/150-into-15000-in-30-days/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Work At Homes</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-15866</link>
		<dc:creator>Work At Homes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-15866</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.  Looks like I might have to check out Pay per post and blog kits.  It might give me extra income and maybe traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.  Looks like I might have to check out Pay per post and blog kits.  It might give me extra income and maybe traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14979</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14979</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jim, I've been trying to sell sponsorships, but it is quite difficult with all the competition out there. There's a lot of opportunities out there. Just need a bit of researching and gaining more traffic to tap into networks with prerequisites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim, I&#8217;ve been trying to sell sponsorships, but it is quite difficult with all the competition out there. There&#8217;s a lot of opportunities out there. Just need a bit of researching and gaining more traffic to tap into networks with prerequisites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14902</guid>
		<description>If you make $10/day from Adsense already Paul, that's great, congratulations, you're just about breaking into that "Google sweetspot" of publishers. I would say that BlogKits isn't for you, it's for millions of bloggers who make 5 cents a day, or less.

You should start selling your own site sponsorships or cpm by now if you're doing that well, you'll probably make more money. That kind of stuff isn't an option for low-traffic bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you make $10/day from Adsense already Paul, that&#8217;s great, congratulations, you&#8217;re just about breaking into that &#8220;Google sweetspot&#8221; of publishers. I would say that BlogKits isn&#8217;t for you, it&#8217;s for millions of bloggers who make 5 cents a day, or less.</p>
<p>You should start selling your own site sponsorships or cpm by now if you&#8217;re doing that well, you&#8217;ll probably make more money. That kind of stuff isn&#8217;t an option for low-traffic bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14899</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14899</guid>
		<description>I actually tried running the blogkits program on my site for a few days. It had a very low CTR, which would probably convert to nearly no chance of actual purchases. Therefore, no money since it's CPA. I think you would need a lot of traffic to get just one person to buy something. As for me, I'm discontinuing its use. I get about $10 a day from adsense. So I guess blogkits is not too sucessful. But only time will tell us if it ends up working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually tried running the blogkits program on my site for a few days. It had a very low CTR, which would probably convert to nearly no chance of actual purchases. Therefore, no money since it&#8217;s CPA. I think you would need a lot of traffic to get just one person to buy something. As for me, I&#8217;m discontinuing its use. I get about $10 a day from adsense. So I guess blogkits is not too sucessful. But only time will tell us if it ends up working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Practical Blogging &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-12-19</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14888</link>
		<dc:creator>Practical Blogging &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-12-19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14888</guid>
		<description>[...] Most Profitable Ad Network For A Low Traffic Blog Surprise, it&#8217;s PayPerPost. (tags: payperpost) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most Profitable Ad Network For A Low Traffic Blog Surprise, it&#8217;s PayPerPost. (tags: payperpost) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclipse</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14870</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclipse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/most-profitable-ad-network-for-a-low-traffic-blog/#comment-14870</guid>
		<description>Just Curious to know what level would be considered low, medium and high traffic. Is there an actual standard? Or is it just a general consensus  amongst bloggers as to the size of a site, in terms of traffic? If no universal standard exists should there be one created? 

From what I have experienced as new blogger, when sites review your site based on traffic they compare it to there own. Ive been accepted to certain programs by having them state that I've received an acceptable amount of traffic. While the same traffic levels for another site are claimed to be to low. So since my traffic level is the same, its the sites tools that are different, it would seem. Correct?

By the way john great blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just Curious to know what level would be considered low, medium and high traffic. Is there an actual standard? Or is it just a general consensus  amongst bloggers as to the size of a site, in terms of traffic? If no universal standard exists should there be one created? </p>
<p>From what I have experienced as new blogger, when sites review your site based on traffic they compare it to there own. Ive been accepted to certain programs by having them state that I&#8217;ve received an acceptable amount of traffic. While the same traffic levels for another site are claimed to be to low. So since my traffic level is the same, its the sites tools that are different, it would seem. Correct?</p>
<p>By the way john great blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
