Watch John Chow on the latest episode of MarketLeverageTV!
 

One More Reason To Dump Google AdSense

written by John Chow on November 13th, 2007

clickzone.jpg

Problogger.net broke a NDA to bring you news that Google is going to bitch slap your AdSense earnings by making it harder to click the ads. In the old AdSense setup, a reader just has to click anywhere inside the ad block to register a click and be sent to the advertiser. The new setup will require the readers to click on the actual ad title or the ad URL. The above click zone map shows what parts of the new ads are now clickable. As you can see, the click zone has been drastically reduced. The main reason for doing this according to Google:

We’re rolling out a change to our text ad formats to help reduce accidental clicks and increase value for advertisers…..This new format will match the changes we’ve implemented on Google.com to help decrease the number of accidental clicks and increase the number of ad conversions. A reduction in accidental clicks will keep users on your pages, interacting with your content until they choose to click on an ad. This change will enhance the user’s overall experience with your websites and improve advertiser campaign value, but it’s likely that your click-through rate will decrease.

It’ll be very interesting to see how the new setup will affect publishers’ AdSense earning. I don’t run Google AdSense on this blog but I have it on other sites. What do you think of Google’s new click zone? A good thing or one more reason to dump AdSense?

Gary Lee said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:16 pm

ooh . . what happens to ProBlogger . . . can he get dinged too???? . . . Google gonna be Mad! . . . but damn them for controlling the net like they do! . . drop them to hell i say!

Reply to this comment
Jasper said on November 14th, 2007 at 1:48 am

most likely they will ban him… :mad:

Reply to this comment
Free e-book membership site said on November 14th, 2007 at 5:37 am

I have banned adsense. I refuse to do business with them :twisted:

Reply to this comment
alexander batista said on November 14th, 2007 at 8:09 am

I think that I will be dumping two things myself one is blogrush and second is google

Reply to this comment
Graham Lutz, The Young Capitalist said on November 14th, 2007 at 9:18 am

I’m dumping Alexander Batista

Reply to this comment
SEO Optimization said on November 14th, 2007 at 3:09 am

ProBlogger being banned…umm i doubt, he could get sued for breaking a NDA but banned from Google’s index i doubt as it is no way related to Google search engine but it is related to Google AdSense (if he ever gets banned would be from AdSense).

Anyway back to John’s question how would we feel with the new ads, if those ads have that background behind the title which will most probably make it look really..and I mean really UGLY the ads I will end up most probably removing it if I won’t have the possibility to use the old ads.

Another thing what I wonder is, what will happen with Google AdSense team’s advice to “blend the ads” will that phrase be valid?

Reply to this comment
Darren said on November 14th, 2007 at 5:25 am

Actually it wasn’t an NDA. I was sent an email as a publisher by my AdSense rep. When I asked her if I could publish it she said that they’d prefer I didn’t until they published about it on their blog. I reluctantly said OK.

However when it was broken by others who got the email from their AdSense reps I figured the cat was out of the bag - emailed my rep - waited for a reply - didn’t get one within an hour - so made the call to post.

I’ve explained it to my AdSense contact and they seem ok with it.

Reply to this comment
HustleStrategy said on November 14th, 2007 at 9:54 am

I am new to your strategy for blogging, but I was curiuos as to why you didn’t post a link to other blogs where it was posted to keep yourself extremely clear from NDA backlash? Only because you are a “big” figure in the eye of google and others.

Reply to this comment
Darren said on November 14th, 2007 at 9:28 pm

As I said above - there was no NDA.

I did email my AdSense rep links to the story that was already broken though to cover my butt :-)

Reply to this comment
Robert said on November 15th, 2007 at 6:05 pm

Just because others broke the news doesn’t mean that it was alright for you to break your agreement with Google. I would expect you to remain professional and keep your word.

Reply to this comment
One Buck Wiki said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:40 am

Yup hell to Google, maybe they are going over their heads now…

Reply to this comment
Blackysky said on November 14th, 2007 at 1:28 pm

I still think is the best move they could do and bring quality to the whole system !!! No more crapy cheap advertiser in the long run.. and now only the rich media ads will perfectly work because of this new clickable ads zone..

So in a longterm , publisher and advertiser can be the real winner .. I don’t see why you should dumb a source of revenue….. however some programs works better with different type of website .. for example adsense is not good for a making money blog :evil: but better on other type of blog we have to see the whole picture before yelling that loud :wink:

Reply to this comment
Obsidian Profile said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:21 pm

That’s kind of lame.

It hurts making money online, but it’s good for all the “regular” businesses that advertise.

Reply to this comment
Jack said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:07 am

Yes, I think this is a good progress. why we think from the publishers side only? what about you John? as we all know that we can see ads saying “You blog’s money maker, I’ll show you…. johnchow.com” anywhere on every blog :)

What do you think as an adwords advertiser. doesn’t this a good thing for you?

Reply to this comment
One Buck Wiki said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:21 pm

DUMP IT! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Enough with bringing down PR of JohnChow dot com, that’s an insult enough…

Reply to this comment
Matt Jones said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:34 am

Surly if advertisers are getting a better conversion rate from the traffic that does click on the ads, the bids on buying clicks will increase, so we all earn more.

Just a theory… for now.

Reply to this comment
David at free Christian resources said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:20 pm

I’m inclined to agree, or that it will just be static.

How many people accidentally click on them anyway? I don’t think I ever have…

Reply to this comment
Joe Ngo said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:22 pm

I would say that its a reason to dump adsense, but I think I’m going to try it and see what happens. It says that we should be getting more relevant clicks, so that might make it more worthwhile to the bloggers in the long run. I would say while they haven’t made me huge amounts of money, it is pretty consistent.

John, I know you don’t run it here, but have you found it being consistent on your other sites?

Reply to this comment
Obsidian Profile said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:27 pm

Yahoo’s Publisher Network is treating me surprisingly well, with many clicks over $2

Reply to this comment
Neil Duckett said on November 14th, 2007 at 5:22 pm

I wish it could be used by non-US residents. :sad:

Reply to this comment
Advice Network Writing contest said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:23 pm

Sometimes in the blog world I have a different perspective, because I don’t plan on selling ads, I plan on buying them. Sometimes things that Google does bothers bloggers, but seems great to me.

Not this time. If I go to the trouble of placing an ad somewhere, I don’t want people to have to play a game of shoot the monkey to hit it. If they want to hit my ad, let them.

Oh well, there are in fact more and more alternatives.

Reply to this comment
Home Recording said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:58 am

Precisely. This is poppycock. Accidental clicking? How many bloggers accidentally click? What are they talking about?

Reply to this comment
Neil Duckett said on November 14th, 2007 at 5:23 pm

Whoops, replied to the wrong comment. :wink:

Reply to this comment
Dave Rigotti said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:26 pm

As an advertiser that spends a considerable amount on Adwords, all I can say is, “It’s about damn time.” Good news for advertisers.

Reply to this comment
Poker Sharks said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:08 am

Seconded!

Finally i might get some decent clicks rather than accidential ones.

Props to Google for being brave enough to make a big change like this. Maybe they’re finnally taking accountability for all the adsense only sites out there that spam the internet.

I had stopped advertising on Adwords because I wasn’t getting good value for money, i might just go back once they introduce this though.

You never know John, you may get less clicks, but each click will be worth more as advertisers will be bidding more due to increased value of the clicks. Could work both ways.

Reply to this comment
One Buck Wiki said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:41 am

Totally agree. I advertise with AdWords and this would really improve my latest experiment with affiliate marketing. Good move on Google’s part, they should have done it earlier.

“I just use AdWords for Affiliate Marketing?”

Reply to this comment
Paul said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:31 pm

Thats interessting news. The funny Thing is that it seems to be true only for the format “medium rectangle” yet.
check it out here: AdFlora.com

Reply to this comment
Michael @ tech said on November 14th, 2007 at 3:22 am

I will check it out :wink:

Reply to this comment
Barry Barnes said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:37 pm

Hello John,
First of all, thanks for all the information that you have made available about making money online. I recently downloaded and read from start to finish your free ebook “Making Money Online With John Chow Dot Com”…facinating…a wealth of information that will take me a while to absorb and put into action. Meanwhile I’m just trying to learn how to use WordPress. Anyway, what do you think is the real reasoning behind this latest “evil” plot by the “Powers that Be” at Google. I mean, sure I’ve accidently click on the wrong link before…I think. But there has to be another reason.
Thanks again.
Barry

Reply to this comment
worknplay said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:37 pm

I am not sure how many people actually click on google adsense anymore. At first when it initially started, it was something of a pioneer in this field but now everybody knows about google and google adsense.

I can visit any site and no matter nhow relevant ad the adsense is showing, still refrain from clicking on it. I think adsense is old news now. Most of the people have realized that adsense isn’t the way to go anymore. My personal opinion. Once you know what it is there for and you know what you get out of it and you ahve pretty much maximized the use of it, you kinda get out of it and that’s the story of adsense. DUMP IT!!!

Reply to this comment
David at free Christian resources said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:26 pm

But then you are a savvy internet user. A lot of people may not be so blind to the adds. Certainly I seem to get a decent click thru rate - even though I tend not to click onon ad sense ads…

Reply to this comment
Mike Huang said on November 13th, 2007 at 10:42 pm

It’s a good thing and a bad thing. Cheaters can’t just click anything now and earn some $$$

-Mike

Reply to this comment
Michael @ tech said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:00 pm

In a way, I do like the new Adsense idea. It gives a better user experience. Sometimes, a reader may click on the ad area by mistake and get directed to another page and this can be very annoying.

But in a money making perspective, John is right.

Reply to this comment
Kym Huynh said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:02 pm

It’s not that bad. I mean c’mon… seriously… if someone wanted to click on an ad, they’d click on the link part cause that’s where people normally click.

Adsense just wants to make sure there’s no accidental clicking… and this should fix that. It may have the reverse effect of what is highlighted in this post and in the original post… advertisers get more value for their money… may encourage them to spend more. Everyone wins.

Reply to this comment
Daniel said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:04 pm

I think they should at least increase the CPC atleast if they move to this change.. If they keep cutting our ways of making decent income then what makes them think publishers would stay with em? When is this in affect?

Reply to this comment
Obsidian Profile said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:07 pm

They’re not entirely interested in keeping publishers rich. You might see a slight increase in CPC, but I have a feeling there aren’t that many unintentional adsense clicks anymore.

Reply to this comment
Wahlau.NET said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:28 pm

this is pretty bad…is this effective already?

Reply to this comment
Marvin said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:33 pm

I’m still a newbie, I wish I could really state an opinion out of experience and have numbers to contrast and compare. Currently I am not making any money on Adsense though it’s probably because I have it halfway down my blog and to the right. I also ignore adsense on other sites so I really am not sure if anyone is paying attention to them anymore.

Reply to this comment
Michael said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:41 pm

This will more then likely effect the amount of money that publishers will get, but I would guess that once advertisers realize that they are getting less and less clicks, they will increase the value of each click.

In the end publishers will get the same amount and advertisers will pay the same amount, even if it takes a while for this to level out.

Reply to this comment
3cpxbro said on November 13th, 2007 at 11:59 pm

Doesn’t really matter - I’m not getting many clicks anyways. Status quo.

Reply to this comment
SmallFishBigMoney.Com said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:00 am

Good for Google Advertisers.
Bad for Google Publishers.
That’s all there is to it.

Reply to this comment
ms danielle said on November 14th, 2007 at 9:55 am

“Good for Google” period.
that’s just sort of their mantra all around

Reply to this comment
webduck said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:15 am

I never made more than a couple bucks from Google AdSense on my blogs Pentimento and iPentimento, so I dumped the ads. Now I am just affiliated with TTZ Media (not sucking up, but I think the TTZ Media ads are much better looking than others :cool: ) and still doing ads for PayPerPost too. Google cares for nothing but the bottom line, as the recent PR debacle demonstrated. Google are weasels. :evil:

Reply to this comment
Ivy said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:00 am

Hey, thanks for the alternatives! Never thought about signing up with TTZ Media Ads before though I see them on John’s posts all the time… Will give PayPerPost a check out too.

Reply to this comment
Bedroom Furniture said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:19 am

True its bad for google publishers but it does seem fair and equitable on the whole. It will prevent lower the incidence of accidental clicks so i suppose it does make more sense

Reply to this comment
Starboykb said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:20 am

:neutral: look pretty bad for blogger and site. maybe google fear the blogger most because they can dig their cash out from their bank lol!

Reply to this comment
SeoVibe said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:25 am

I’ll break the news a little further since it’s already on some sites Google is likely going to roll out some newly tested ad formats too that let you blend better. CSS enabled including choice of logo, it’s in beta accounts now. Heres one example (top right side) http://www.patrickokeefe.com/

Reply to this comment
Patrick said on November 14th, 2007 at 11:56 am

Hello,

Thanks for the mention.

I just wanted to let you know that that is actually very old. It’s an invite only testing program that gives invited publishers access to code that allows you to further customize the appearance of the ads with the approval of a Google representative. No worries.

Thanks,

Patrick

Reply to this comment
Blog Contests said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:33 am

I have already dumped them from most of my sites… they are only a last resort.

Reply to this comment
Etienne Teo said on November 14th, 2007 at 12:38 am

I am delighted to see google moving on and i really hope this move will have more advertisers throwing in more cash so that we will earn more over the time. I just hope so. :mrgreen:

Reply to this comment
shy guy said on November 14th, 2007 at 1:33 am

I dont think much different than before.. Only it will go to advertiser area if you click in the area…
I don’t think it will affect more to publisher..

Reply to this comment
Jeff Kee said on November 14th, 2007 at 1:41 am

From an end user point of view, this is kind of nice. Some ads have too much clickables that I often accidentally do click on things.

Reply to this comment
Domtan said on November 14th, 2007 at 9:32 am

Agree. Honest publishers have been crying out for Google to do something about accidental clicks on their own sites. This prevents it considerably.

Reply to this comment
Michael said on November 14th, 2007 at 1:59 am

Aren’t adverts supposed to be clicked if a user is interested? This might actually improve your adsense earnings as users who are interested will click out of interest and possibly buy out of interest.

I suppose it is two faced, but how I see it, it could actually benefit a blog in some way. I doubt the change will be too great (and I definitely hope so), but maybe it isn’t such a big loss.

Good luck to everyone for the future.
Michael.

Reply to this comment
Budi S said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:00 am

I think this is good news for the advertiser …
and it’s fair for all the internet user …
When you get an income from internet advertiser …
the advertiser must get profit from their advertise too …

Reply to this comment
Chris said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:00 am

I think google is under pressure by the many advertisers using Adsense. Adsense is all about making money for all parties involved, but this change by google just goes to show that advertisers using adsense bring a greater returns and pretty much have a greater control over googles decision making. :grin:

My heart goes out to the smaller Website/blog with less traffic- like my site :cry:. I believe if google do implement these new google adsense ads - if your low traffic website was making 2:00-a-day, you will maybe make 1.00-a-day. And that means it will take these smaller website/blog twice as much time to get paid.

So I just goes to show that its all about google and protecting their best interest.
- less payout to smaller Site/blogs
- Make the advertisers Happy

Can anyone tell me what are the benefits for publisher if this new adsense ads are implemented?

Reply to this comment
Ivy said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:05 am

Oops, I just realised John has an entire list of recommended money makers at the bottom of the page… I wonder if he will remove Adsense from below since his last report showed that Adsense contributed to more than half of his earnings… :twisted:

Reply to this comment
Chri said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:29 am

Great Question…. JC …we need a answer on this one…. Is Google adsense still one of your recommended money makers :?:

Reply to this comment
Poker Sharks said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:50 am

Ummm, Adsense accounted for 0% of Johns earnings from the blog last month.

Reply to this comment
Ivy said on November 14th, 2007 at 9:07 am

Oops, my bad. I mixed it up with Private Ad Sales. I wonder if John will do a post on the Techniques of Getting Private Ad Sales, or did I miss that as well?

Reply to this comment
Ivy said on November 14th, 2007 at 9:04 am

Another reason to ditch Adsense - there’s a discrepancy in the reports they generate and other trackers. I have MyBlogLog tracker installed on my blog which tracks the clicks made by visitors. According to MyBlogLog, I had 4 clicks on Google Ads in the past week (my blog is only a month old or so) which was NOT recorded in my Adsense report.

Sadly, MyBlogLog reports only up to a week’s worth of reports, and I had 3 stumbles earlier than that. So if there were other earnings lost, there is no way that I can track it. :evil:

Reply to this comment
Etienne Teo said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:19 am

He will not remove adsense, since he have other sites that are using them and i believe they are doing pretty well for him. :mrgreen:

Reply to this comment
SpinDigg said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:22 am

Whilst adsense is one of the easy monetizing options for bloggers and webmasters it will continue to be used even if it does make less money. Webmasters need to learn other ways to monetize by trying other methods and stick to what makes the most cash.

Reply to this comment
Online Poker said on November 14th, 2007 at 2:43 am

I think it’s good for advertisers, but for webmasters it’s a bad thing. Most probably the CTR rate will drop, hopefully not too much..

Reply to this comment
Michael Woo said on November 14th, 2007 at 3:06 am

Why are they making everything hard to webmasters?!
PR drop,
Adsense changes,
No selling text links..
I wonder when is this gonna end… Did the entire blog community did something bad to Google that they are slapping us hard?

Reply to this comment
Mubin said on November 14th, 2007 at 3:15 am

Being a publisher myself I am sure that this will lead to my CTR falling, but thinking of it from an advertisers point of view it will lead to more successful conversions rather than accidental ones. Which will in effect lead to advertisers paying more for CPC, and that will in effect HOPEFULLY be passed onto the publishers.

Google is a advertiser and what they are doing is servicing their clients, they have to keep them happy if they want them to stay with them instead of going to someone like Azoogle.

Reply to this comment
vexx said on November 14th, 2007 at 3:48 am

Adsense became less and less useful for publishers the past 1-2 years,but in my opinion it still brings a good income stream for many blogs/websites.This new click policy will surely start some fights,while the advertisers will be very happy, the publishers won’t

Reply to this comment
Retrolum said on November 14th, 2007 at 3:54 am

I guess it is in general a good change. Although at first only adwords customers will profit from this change, in the end I guess also the publishers will profit: More value will cause (hopefully) higher clickprices.

Reply to this comment
Part Time Blogger said on November 14th, 2007 at 3:59 am

I think will is a good thing for the advertiser, google are doing the right thing. I know this will make it a little harder for the publisher to make money. But i cant see it making a major difference to there income.99% of people are only making $? a day anyway,me included. You just have to work at it to keep it rising. Go with the changes and keep moving forward!

Reply to this comment
BloggerDollar.com said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:15 am

I just wrote a review about the situation. I think that they are going to lose some targeted visitors. This will bring a bad result for publisher in short term.

http://www.bloggerdollar.com/2007/11/14/google-adsense-making-no-sense

Reply to this comment
Cheryl said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:19 am

I don’t think this is nearly as bad as it appears… As someone who has used both Adwords and Adsense (that is, been an advertiser and a publisher,) I can tell you what my two biggest problems were…

1. As an advertiser, the value per click was absolutely abysmal. And copy didn’t help all that much. There were many, many accidental clicks - clicks that I had to pay for that brought me NO revenue. It was horrid. Thus, I stopped using adwords as an advertiser.

2. As a publisher, the amount I received per click was lower than almost every other ad network (yes, I tested this.) Publishers simply weren’t willing to pay $0.50 a click when it took 200 clicks to make a sale (or whatever action they were trying to get.) And those were the advertisers who even bothered to put their ads into the Google content network - a number which is getting smaller every day.

So, what will this mean? More quality clicks = higher conversion rate for advertisers. Higher conversion rate = higher break-even point. Higher break-even point means they can pay more per click. More per click = more money for you. 5 clicks worth a penny vs. 1 click worth a dime? You know exactly which one you would pick.

Oh, and because you’ll be getting more targeted traffic from the adwords ads that YOU run, you’ll likely end up getting a higher value per visitor than you were before. Which also means more money for you.

I think Google has made a smart move here. I may be wrong, though - so I’ll be watching this closely. :)

- Cherilyn Lester, Copywriter

Reply to this comment
Thomas De Maesschalck said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:20 am

I just checked out the ads at Google.com and the clickable area is even smaller than in the image you published. Only the titles are clickable, even the green links can’t be clicked anymore :???:

Reply to this comment
One Buck Wiki said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:39 am

Wow, this is amazing but I think this’d be great for affiliate marketers who won’t benefit from crappy clickin’ :mrgreen:

Reply to this comment
One Buck Wiki said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:38 am

Hey I am offering site-wide Blogroll links on http://Zedomax.com/blog which is a PR4 for anyone willing to link to http://onebuckwiki.com.
We even got an affiliate program so….

Reply to this comment
One Buck Wiki said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:50 am

Hi John,

Did you get my e-mail? I wanted to change the banner so I can start making money for you with the OneBuckWiki 25% OFF Coupon code: JOHNCHOW.
That’s right, get 25% on all pages by using coupon code JOHNCHOW at OneBuckWiki.com.

Reply to this comment
Michael said on November 14th, 2007 at 4:53 am

Guys, be a little more optimistic here. Google is cutting down on the available pixels to click, but maybe they’ll change their TOS to allow publishers to say “Click here” or “Support the advertisers, click here”.

/end sarcasm

Reply to this comment
Jason Green said on November 14th, 2007 at 5:02 am

I don’t think this will have too much of a negative effect on earnings.

It will improve advertisers ROI meaning they will spend more per click anyway so it will all even out.

Reply to this comment
Home Recording said on November 14th, 2007 at 5:05 am

I am neither a buyer nor a seller. I am a reader of blogs. I think that it insults me when they talk about accidental clicking. I prefer a larger area to click on. Saves wrist and finger movement and consequent fatigue.

Reply to this comment
bmunch said on November 14th, 2007 at 6:21 am

Oh nooo!
now my single digit earnings from adsense will stay that way for a long long time. :sad:

Reply to this comment
Jonathan said on November 14th, 2007 at 6:21 am

:cool: I think we are exagerating this change on clickable zones.
How much can your earning drop?, 10%? if it drops below 50% then you are having some serious issue with ‘accidental clicks’.
Anybody who really wants to click on the ad, will click the url, that is for sure, how dumb youhave to be if you click on the area next to the url and think…..oh, this site doesnt work.
Nothing bad will happen.

Reply to this comment
aop said on November 14th, 2007 at 6:33 am

At least the link ads won’t be affected. Properly placed they can big big income providers.

Reply to this comment
Andy said on November 14th, 2007 at 6:44 am

It’s a good move as long as our web real estate is not wasted in any dead zones.

Reply to this comment
knupNET said on November 14th, 2007 at 6:48 am

I think it’s a huge deal. Reducing the click area by that much is significant. I use adsense on a lot of sites but have been looking for an excuse to switch. This might be it… Thanks john.

Reply to this comment
TheWebmastersCafe.net said on November 14th, 2007 at 6:48 am

Well if this avoids accidental clicks, could it mean that the advertisers could get a better ROI? And if they get a higher ROI, would that mean that the publishers may see their AdSense income increase?

Reply to this comment
Brad K. said on November 14th, 2007 at 7:04 am

This article seems silly. Most people intending to click on a link already aim for titles or URL’s. Getting alarmed about Google’s ‘change’ seems .. silly.

Reply to this comment
JoeTech.com said on November 14th, 2007 at 7:05 am

I’ve noticed some interesting things with my AdSense that I’ll be reporting on my linkbait blog soon. In short, I’m pretty sure Google is not paying out on most (sometimes) all of my clicks for a day.

Reply to this comment
Ivy said on November 14th, 2007 at 8:34 pm

I’m absolutely with you on this. There are discrepancies on their reports as opposed to other trackers. They are not registering for quite a number of clicks on my blog.

Reply to this comment
Mike said on November 14th, 2007 at 7:09 am

Well if it makes it a little more efficient than maybe the payout will go up a little bit? mmm Maybe not.. well hopefully google will pass on the savings in efficiency on to both advetisers and publishers.

Reply to this comment
Chris Jacobson said on November 14th, 2007 at 7:27 am

Webmasters shouldn’t give Google the satisfaction of using AdSense.

Reply to this comment
James said on November 14th, 2007 at 7:35 am

I don’t think it will reduce your CTR that much if you were not playing on the fact that the whole thing was clickable before.

I try to blend ads and although I don’t have proof, I think the click I get on the ads are from people who want to click on that link, and after the change it will be the same, they’ll still want ot click on that link.
I don’t think they click on the white space because they want to click somewhere else than the ad.

Reply to this comment
Michelle Amos said on November 14th, 2007 at 7:48 am

Hey John!

I met you at the blog world expo! You’re a funny guy! I didn’t get to speak with you as much as I would have liked there, but I am featuring you on my blog and would like to know just HOW MUCH MONEY DO YOU HAVE???????? Please send me an email, and I’ll send conference instructions. Let’s chat!!!!!!!

Reply to this comment
Steve Poland said on November 14th, 2007 at 7:56 am

This will likely reduce CTR, but only for the sneaky sites — the sites that purposefully embed these ads and make them look like something the dummy end-user should click on. Yes that makes money, but that’s not the user-experience the user wants, nor is it the users the advertiser wants to be paying for [clicks that shouldn't have occurred].

I like the change. It’ll likely lead to more innovation in the field; other ways to monetize, etc.

Reply to this comment
Mark said on November 14th, 2007 at 8:04 am

It sounds like Google is just trying to be more inline with TLA, after all, TLA uses links only for visitors to click on. So why should Google have to use the whole ad to make it clickable.

If you wanted to make the whole ad clickable, then just go to video or image ads. It doesn’t make sense to dump it when Google offers you plenty of choices.

I have been browsing through some website on my mobile and it appears that link ads are showing better than image ads so it may be a good thing. They are already using link ads anyways.

Reply to this comment