I vote for the mac fanclub

I vote for “The Air Thoughts of a vivid mind” Good job!

Sort of funny, a couple of them use the exact same theme as you. Just to be certain, the last link I posted worked, right?

Air Thoughts was way too long winded. Charles Hamel seemed one sided, no criticism. Though I must admit I am biased :).

I’ll try to read the other ones later. Happy holidays to all.

John Wesley - Yes, your link works. Look for it to get posted soon!

Excellent.

Regarding the other reviews:

In Pursuit of the Dream Remix - reads like a lab report. If I had to take one–Strange Progress.

Ive been noticing visitors from out your way already creeping in! As well as readers from your site specifically. I wonder did any reviewers use the line “its Chow time?” because if not…they should.

Just curious–Why don’t you post your name ‘clipse?

John Wesley -> I realize my review is quite lengthy. I have a bad habit of not being able to stop writing once I start. HAHA!! But hey, I’m still learning.

Hey thanks JohnW - I thought I’d take a humorous line as you may have noticed!

Matt

Considering I am reading you every day, I will also write a review, already started it, just need to fine tune it a little.

Thats a good question John Wesley…I think I’ll write a post about in the next couple of days…I’ll let you know when its up.

WoW, tHERE ARE A LOT

Woah! There are a LOT of people using Misty Wordpress theme.

Probaby because of the “Chow factor”.

Ha there are a lot of the chow blog themes lol

Hope my link will show up in the next batch

great reviews though

First off, good work on this topic John. I think this is a great exploration of a timely and interesting topic.

There is one bit that I’d like to add to the discussion however. While I agree that the quality of the volunteer posts are generally better than the PPP ones, there is a significant variable that creates an uneven playing field.

The big issue with PPP posts is that as a blogger, you have to write your entry, then grab the opportunity. This means that you have to write quickly, all the while hoping that the opportunity doesn’t disappear because others were quicker. This race condition reduces the average quality of posts coming from this source.

Also, while this is complete speculation, I suspect that at least some of the volunteers had a much greater level of familiarity with your blog than the PPP bloggers. Again, that’s speculative, but it’s of importance to the discussion.

This is not to say that the volunteer posts aren’t better than the PPP posts, they are. But it’s rather to bring to light some of the factors involved that I personally think might be at work here.

If you have an established, well read blog and offering a backlink has a lot of value behind it, then soliciting volunteers makes a lot of sense. Not all are so fortunate. For those who aren’t, PPP can be a helpful option.

I do appreciate the discussion you’re bringing to light here. It’s great to see all the various facets of this very interesting issue.

Well, so much for the “johnchow” effect!

I’d be very interested to hear from the other reviewers if they saw a significant traffic spike from this.

Don’t expect too much of a spike. It’s Christmas and traffic is way down! If I didn’t know this was normal, I would panic.

Out of about 200 visits I think perhaps 75% of them came from you.

Thanks again John!

[...] other bloggers for the opportunity. A reader of this blog has commented that one of the reasons the review for linkback reviews of my blog were better than the PayPerPost reviews was due to the pressure of getting a review in [...]