<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slashdot Still Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/slashdot-still-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/slashdot-still-rules/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/slashdot-still-rules/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 11:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/index.php/slashdot-still-rules/#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>Slashdot has a better residual effect as well... Often you'll get a nice lump of traffic from slashdot, but there are a lot of other publishers and editors who read that site, and will promote your story after seeing it on slashdot. I have had articles posted in print, newspaper interviews, etc, because of the 'slashdot residual effect'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slashdot has a better residual effect as well&#8230; Often you&#8217;ll get a nice lump of traffic from slashdot, but there are a lot of other publishers and editors who read that site, and will promote your story after seeing it on slashdot. I have had articles posted in print, newspaper interviews, etc, because of the &#8217;slashdot residual effect&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
