<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PageRank Ripple - PageRank is Dead!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: m07</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-115410</link>
		<dc:creator>m07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-115410</guid>
		<description>i am on your side.totally agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am on your side.totally agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Loves Blogger Who Don't Sell Links</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-113328</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Loves Blogger Who Don't Sell Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-113328</guid>
		<description>[...] reduced, but then restored after a week, such as Problogger. Some are permanently reduced, such as JohnChow. Google penalize bloggers who sell links. I think whenever there is a war, there will be collateral [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reduced, but then restored after a week, such as Problogger. Some are permanently reduced, such as JohnChow. Google penalize bloggers who sell links. I think whenever there is a war, there will be collateral [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Recent PageRank Update and its after effects &#124; Joyce Babu</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-113187</link>
		<dc:creator>The Recent PageRank Update and its after effects &#124; Joyce Babu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-113187</guid>
		<description>[...] Another major reason for PageRank getting its present day (or pre-october days?) significance was that most of the advertisers used to give much importance to PR, while choosing the sites to advertise on. Now that many of the top sites selling links are having lower PR, there is no point in continuing the policy. If advertisers don&#8217;t care much about PR, then most of the webmasters will be giving any even lesser importance to PageRank, which is reflected by the recent boycotts. Hence I too think Jamie is right in saying that PageRank is dead as a dodo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another major reason for PageRank getting its present day (or pre-october days?) significance was that most of the advertisers used to give much importance to PR, while choosing the sites to advertise on. Now that many of the top sites selling links are having lower PR, there is no point in continuing the policy. If advertisers don&#8217;t care much about PR, then most of the webmasters will be giving any even lesser importance to PageRank, which is reflected by the recent boycotts. Hence I too think Jamie is right in saying that PageRank is dead as a dodo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cappellate</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112589</link>
		<dc:creator>cappellate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112589</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ottobre &#8216;07: statistiche e Page Rank&lt;/strong&gt;

Questo articolo oggi vuole essere autocelebrativo, autoreferenziale e di ringraziamento. Questo piccolo blog da questa settimana ha pagerank 4  . La cosa divertente è che questo ha avuto una forte ricaduta sulle classifiche dei blog italiani, in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ottobre &#8216;07: statistiche e Page Rank</strong></p>
<p>Questo articolo oggi vuole essere autocelebrativo, autoreferenziale e di ringraziamento. Questo piccolo blog da questa settimana ha pagerank 4  . La cosa divertente è che questo ha avuto una forte ricaduta sulle classifiche dei blog italiani, in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldmoney</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112380</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldmoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112380</guid>
		<description>Well interesting point you have here. I also don't know how PageRank works, but my blog got PageRank 2, I am very happy with that and all I can say John Chow welcome to my world ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well interesting point you have here. I also don&#8217;t know how PageRank works, but my blog got PageRank 2, I am very happy with that and all I can say John Chow welcome to my world <img src='http://www.johnchow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redopinion.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Pagerank Update Drama</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112173</link>
		<dc:creator>redopinion.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Pagerank Update Drama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112173</guid>
		<description>[...] people have suggested that PageRank is dead while some have seen the pendulum swing  and they receive a PR that they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] people have suggested that PageRank is dead while some have seen the pendulum swing  and they receive a PR that they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizzie</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112129</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112129</guid>
		<description>I wasn't going to comment because this post is so old, but... 

Those who would correct someone else's grammar should themselves be error free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to comment because this post is so old, but&#8230; </p>
<p>Those who would correct someone else&#8217;s grammar should themselves be error free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEVTRENCH Rises from the Ashes of the Google Nuke &#124; DEVTRENCH: Web Development from the Front Lines</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112115</link>
		<dc:creator>DEVTRENCH Rises from the Ashes of the Google Nuke &#124; DEVTRENCH: Web Development from the Front Lines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-112115</guid>
		<description>[...] The PageRank Ripple - PageRank is Dead! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The PageRank Ripple - PageRank is Dead! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielctw</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-111992</link>
		<dc:creator>danielctw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-111992</guid>
		<description>page rank is their standard. Unless of coz if yahoo comes up an equivalent of something like tat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>page rank is their standard. Unless of coz if yahoo comes up an equivalent of something like tat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: relaxMax</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-111986</link>
		<dc:creator>relaxMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/the-pagerank-ripple-pagerank-is-dead/#comment-111986</guid>
		<description>Let's see if I can follow this.

1. It is bad to buy your way to the top...
2. unless you are bidding on a word in an Adsense bidding war.

Putting it another way,

1. It is bad to charge people money for an advertisement (link) on your successful website;
2. It is ok to charge people money for and advertisement link on your own website as long as almost all of the money charged goes into Google's pocket.

Have I got that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see if I can follow this.</p>
<p>1. It is bad to buy your way to the top&#8230;<br />
2. unless you are bidding on a word in an Adsense bidding war.</p>
<p>Putting it another way,</p>
<p>1. It is bad to charge people money for an advertisement (link) on your successful website;<br />
2. It is ok to charge people money for and advertisement link on your own website as long as almost all of the money charged goes into Google&#8217;s pocket.</p>
<p>Have I got that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
