<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Aff Or Not To Aff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WesleyTech.com</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-58107</link>
		<dc:creator>WesleyTech.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-58107</guid>
		<description>Affiliate disclosure on your OWN site is not needed in my opinion.

Now that you are using the johnchow.com/go/ links, your affiliate links are even more masked.

Thank you,
Wesley...
http://DVDRentalForums.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Affiliate disclosure on your OWN site is not needed in my opinion.</p>
<p>Now that you are using the johnchow.com/go/ links, your affiliate links are even more masked.</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Wesley&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://DVDRentalForums.com" rel="nofollow">http://DVDRentalForums.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Henningsen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-57907</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Henningsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 08:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-57907</guid>
		<description>Not to Aff.  If they are going to click on the link out of curiosity for the word, then why should they care if it is an affiliate link.  After all it is showing them content relevant to the word they clicked on.

Adam
TheAdambox.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to Aff.  If they are going to click on the link out of curiosity for the word, then why should they care if it is an affiliate link.  After all it is showing them content relevant to the word they clicked on.</p>
<p>Adam<br />
TheAdambox.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-53553</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-53553</guid>
		<description>I like the aff tag - it's good to disclose this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the aff tag - it&#8217;s good to disclose this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Student Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-53145</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Student Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-53145</guid>
		<description>Why would you care about someone "accusing" you of being an affiliate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you care about someone &#8220;accusing&#8221; you of being an affiliate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Student Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-53141</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Student Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-53141</guid>
		<description>Lose the aff! Looks cheap (and annoying!)

And no disclosures either. We're all big boys here - no need to explain that *gosh - oh no!* you're making money! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lose the aff! Looks cheap (and annoying!)</p>
<p>And no disclosures either. We&#8217;re all big boys here - no need to explain that *gosh - oh no!* you&#8217;re making money! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndoDX</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52559</link>
		<dc:creator>IndoDX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52559</guid>
		<description>I think if there are AFF option, doing AFF is good reason ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if there are AFF option, doing AFF is good reason <img src='http://www.johnchow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aris</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52330</link>
		<dc:creator>Aris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52330</guid>
		<description>So what is your last word, John?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is your last word, John?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52278</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52278</guid>
		<description>I say no to the (aff) or any other indication.  There's simply no need.  The alleged need for disclosure comes from the fear that some bloggers will start to lie like crazy and sucker people into something unfairly.  The way I see it so long as you're still writing honestly, there's no need to disclose affiliate links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say no to the (aff) or any other indication.  There&#8217;s simply no need.  The alleged need for disclosure comes from the fear that some bloggers will start to lie like crazy and sucker people into something unfairly.  The way I see it so long as you&#8217;re still writing honestly, there&#8217;s no need to disclose affiliate links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52241</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52241</guid>
		<description>"they’re meant to be the ‘new media’ right?"

No, not really.  A blog is a blog.  To stretch the analogy to say that all blogs will be the new media is to say that all written work is old media.  Just because I scribble something down on paper and show it to people doesn't suddenly put me under the ethical guidelines that a newspaper is allegedly supposed to follow.

Blogs are the same.  Those that are out there pushing themselves as a news source may need to adhere to a higher ethical standard, but 99% of blogs out there are just blogs.  A personal website that happens to follow a chronological publishing order.

I find people paint blogs with an extremely wide brush very often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they’re meant to be the ‘new media’ right?&#8221;</p>
<p>No, not really.  A blog is a blog.  To stretch the analogy to say that all blogs will be the new media is to say that all written work is old media.  Just because I scribble something down on paper and show it to people doesn&#8217;t suddenly put me under the ethical guidelines that a newspaper is allegedly supposed to follow.</p>
<p>Blogs are the same.  Those that are out there pushing themselves as a news source may need to adhere to a higher ethical standard, but 99% of blogs out there are just blogs.  A personal website that happens to follow a chronological publishing order.</p>
<p>I find people paint blogs with an extremely wide brush very often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Conciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52143</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Conciousness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/to-aff-or-not-to-aff/#comment-52143</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Affiliate Links&lt;/strong&gt;

Yet another post inspired by John Chow, but at least this one is probably more helpful.
In a recent article, John Chow discusses the idea whether affiliate links in posts should be marked as such or not.
For those of you who have not read the title of ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Affiliate Links</strong></p>
<p>Yet another post inspired by John Chow, but at least this one is probably more helpful.<br />
In a recent article, John Chow discusses the idea whether affiliate links in posts should be marked as such or not.<br />
For those of you who have not read the title of &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
