Get an iPhone App for your Blog - Learn More
 

Who Wants To Be a Magpie?

written by John Chow on November 24th, 2008

It was bound to happen sooner or later. A new site is offering to pay you to send sponsored tweets to your Twitter followers. Be a Magpie promises to convert your tweets into bling-bling if you allow them to spam your followers with commercial messages.

How Magpie Works

According to Be a Magpie, you can make money with Twitter in three easy steps.

  1. You define a tweet frequency at which you will accept magpie-tweets for your Twitter account. Given your current tweet rate permits it, our service will try to find a matching magpie-tweet and twitter it.
  2. Magpie-tweets will contain the hashtag “#magpie” and thus be readily identifiable from your other tweets.
  3. For each successfully delivered magpie-tweet you will be rewarded in cash. Remuneration depends on the number of your followers and the popularity of the magpie-tweet’s topic.

You select a the ratio between your normal tweets to paid tweet and Be a Magpie does the rest. The ratio can be as low as one paid tweet for every 20 normal tweets to as high as 1 to 1. The more paid tweets you run, the more you can make.

I Am Going To Have Sooooo Much Bling!

I'm going to have sooo many coins!How much you make depends on how many Twitter followers you have, how often you hit them with paid tweets and the topic category. Be a Magpie has a little Bling-Bling calculator on their site to give you an idea on what you can make.

Based on my 2,967 Twitter followers, Be a Magpie estimates that I would make 863.32 Pounds per month ($1,306.05 USD). That sounds pretty good but I highly doubt it can really make that much. I can’t imagine the service has signed up that many advertisers yet. There’s also the security issue. In order to send out the paid tweet, Be a Magpie needs your Twitter password. While Be a Magpie maybe a legit company, it might also be a huge phishing scam to take over people’s Twitter accounts. There’s also the questions of how many people will stop following you because you’re running paid tweets.

Twitter doesn’t have anything in their TOS that specifically prevents you from being paid to make tweets. However, this doesn’t mean they won’t update their TOS and try to kill the commercialization of their service. I personally think they can’t stop it even if they try.

Would You Be a Magpie?

I’m interested to know how many readers would consider being a magpie. I’m also interested in knowing if you would stop following anyone who sends you a paid tweet. I’ve found the best way to make money from Twitter is indirectly. I use Twitter to help send traffic to my blog, which makes the money. This doesn’t mean I’m opposed to a service like Be a Magpie. However, I’m not for it either. I’m going to sit on the fence and watch for a bit. What do you think?

Tweet This Tweet This Post!
English flagItalian flagKorean flagChinese (Simplified) flagChinese (Traditional) flagPortuguese flagGerman flagFrench flagSpanish flagJapanese flagArabic flagRussian flagGreek flagDutch flagBulgarian flagCzech flagCroatian flagDanish flagFinnish flagHindi flagPolish flagRomanian flagSwedish flagNorwegian flagCatalan flagFilipino flagHebrew flagIndonesian flagLatvian flagLithuanian flagSerbian flagSlovak flagSlovenian flagUkrainian flagVietnamese flag
By N2H
  1. From the way your wrote it “you allow them to spam your followers..” I think I’d vote against something like this to be honest – I have no problem with advertising – but I’d prefer not to be bombarded by it, nor would I bomb my loyal readers with it either

  2. I really didnt like reading about this and I hope that it doesn’t take off. I already have people following me for no apparent reason, I don’t want to see paid tweets all day.

    We’ll see what happens i guess.

  3. Sounds like an awesome idea to cash in on. Who wouldn’t want more than $1,000 per month just for setting up an advertising account and it automatically does it for you. Sounds like easy money.

    • But that approach is so limiting.

      Sure, you may make a few hundred dollars, but so much more value would be gained from building your personal brand using a tool such as Twitter which can then be leveraged at a later time for much better results.

      My dad used to always say this to me as a kid: you can have one piece of candy now, but if you wait an hour you can have three pieces. As a kid, of course I just wanted candy then and there, but when looking at business it’s entirely the wrong approach to take. Patience is key.

  4. I’m with you on this one John. Not sure yet. Part of me sees the benefits from a business marketing perspective. However, I think this will end Twitter as we know it if is widely adopted.

    Anyone actually using it yet who can comment.

  5. I think it’s a good a idea to use twitter for making money…. Hmmm… i should use twitter more…

  6. Most of Twitter is filled with bots and fake accounts anyways, so it wouldn’t make much of a difference and you probably won’t lose much followers.

    -Mike

  7. C’mon John, even you’ve got limits haven’t you.

    This is nothing but spammy junk messaging. I think this service has the potential to ruin twitter. And yep, you watch Twitter close the loophole that currently allows this activity.

  8. I think I have to side with most of the people here. Advertising on Twitter is too much. Your brand will be tarnished and you will lose followers. People will start using Twitter as a spamming tool. I think using Twitter to advertise your blog should be the farthest you should go.

  9. Interesting everyone want more than $1,000 per month just for setting up an advertising account and it automatically does it for you

  10. Not cool in my opinion. These guys are trying to turn out one of the most original and revolutionary services on the web today. I don’t think Twitter folks would find this very amusing, either — at least the breach of password privacy of their user accounts.

    John I think it’s cool that you’re asking us our opinion. Not sure if we sway your decisions, though…

  11. personnaly, i would go for MagPie to be honest and i will never stop following anyone for sending out paid tweets.

    But logically it will harm your brand in a way or another, because it is exactly like SMS Promotions.

  12. I will take the plunge! I only have 7 followers at the moment.

  13. I think I will block you if you tweet me some pai tweets. :) )

  14. even though this may be the future im sure there has to be an easier way to make money off of twitter

  15. I’ve tried it, BeaMagPie tell me i could win up to $15 a month

    That’s just 2 weeks i’ve tested it and only 2 ads tweet that gave me $0.07 each

    I’m not to be rich with only $0.14 a month :s

  16. Spam my followers I will have to say no to this one,and would most likely stop following someone that used it to spam me.

  17. LOL! donsanchez can earn 2,15$ per month. Nevermind – keep going.

  18. John, I think you should pass on it. You’ve spent sooo long building up the John Chow brand and you don’t want to spoil it with something like this.

  19. i’m sorry, but this just sucks. advertising is not what makes the world go around. can’t anything social remain just, well, social?

    i will sign off twitter in a heartbeat if i start getting spammed with ads there. that would destroy twitter for me.

  20. I wouldn’t like it to receive more advertisings. I think your way is a great way. Using twitter to drive traffic back to the blog and making money on it. Kepp doing that John…

    Daniel

  21. I’d be pretty pissed if I started getting hit with spam from dozens of my tweet friend sat once. What happens if you have thousands of followers and hundreds of them sign up for this? Signal to noise goes completely to hell!!

  22. It would only piss off your followers John. To much advertisement is annoying.

  23. When I wrote about this on my blog and polled my Twitter followers, the consensus was that this wasn’t a good idea and that they’d stop following people who use Magpie. And I’m not surprised.

    That said, such a thing is inevitable. It is ReviewMe or PayPerPost for Twitter.

  24. Great idea in theory but to implement it seems a little excessive. Maybe if the community created a giant mag-pie circle to strictly keep tweets isolated to a group, and a capitalize on the profit I could see some interest. Strictly as an advertising role? No beans. Collaborative community? I’m in.

  25. When that first came out a few weeks ago a bunch of people signed up for it. Evrey time I saw a magpie tweet I stopped following that person.

    Allowing other people/companies to post for you is not cool.

  26. I like the ingenuity of this company, but I don’t think I like the fact that they are pretty much spamming twitter with this service.

  27. John,

    I do not want Twitter cluttered up with commercial applications. In it’s pure form it is useful. If we open the floodgates to every marketing scheme Twitter will be compromised, not to mention all the database bloating that Twitter will experience!

    I will not be a Magpie for any amount of money!

    Thanks for the post,

    Respectfully, Nicholas Chase – ‘the video guy’ from BlogWorld Expo
    http://donotreadthisblogunless.blogspot.com/

  28. I’ve thought about it myself, the money they “claim” I could make would cover my monthly car payment! In the end, I decided against it. It’s not worth it to lose my followers. They follow me for my posts, not to be sold to…

  29. Nope. I would not be a Magpie and I would stop following anyone who sent my this kind of tweet. Of-course I am not a realy player with a lot of followers, anyway…but I am hoping the real players won’t play.

  30. Spam is spam – invasive, impersonal, and annoying. Everything Twitter is not. I’m blocking anyone who ‘magpies’ me instead of writing something even mildly interesting. Even if it’s about what their dog had for breakfast.

  31. I have mixed feelings about magpie. When I first heard about it I immediately recoiled in disgust. But then I gave it more thought.

    A LOT of people are promoting products or services via tweets. I would say 98% of twitter users promote their own stuff on a daily/weekly basis. No problem tooting their on horn, right?

    But the smart ones add in many tweets that are more personal in nature, they reply to other tweets, etc. They don’t make it all about the personal promotion, affiliate links, etc.

    I wouldn’t unfollow a person for an occasional magpie tweet. If it was every other tweet, then yeah, I’d probably be annoyed and drop that person.

    But that is the same for someone who tweets ALL THE TIME about their freakin’ Squidoo lenses, or their affiliate links, etc.

    It’s about moderation when you come down to it.

  32. John, beyond the my followers will be pissed (I don’t even have ads on my personal blog, though I should really), what I’m most skeptical of is the whole “you can make x….” pitch.

    At Qumana we tried to do this with contextual ads that bloggers would place in posts. It was simple, easy and blogger controlled. The technology wasn’t hard, it was getting advertisers to pay descent CPCs that was the challenge.

    I think people are going to sign up, see their followers abandon them, and then not even see the payoff.

    I don’t mind Twitter monetizing, I just think it’s bad to monetize your tweets. Almost like trying to monetize your own emails to friends and family.

    The link in this comment is to my original post on the topic when it came out.

  33. seems like I posted about Magpie, long back when the service was launched (to be exact three days after the service initiated)…
    http://isthisnikhil.com/make-money-with-twitter/
    but now I can see, the more followers I have, magpie stops working (ocourse lack of advertisers)

    you can ocourse check some initial responses on the service in this post..
    always love the feedbacks…

  34. I’m not going to use the service since I don’t want to spam my followers. In the past, through services as Entrecard, I’ve booted people from my favourites list because they were running pay-per-post ads on their blogs. I absolutely dislike crappy paid-for content and will not put up with it… especially if it’s unrelated to a blog’s content.

    That’s how I’ll probably react to magpie ads too.

  35. Sam

    Tina’s got it bang on. nth else to say.

  36. I joined Magpie as a publisher about a week ago, and I’m still waiting for the first ad to appear. The ad I submitted as an advertiser hasn’t been approved yet (has been submitted 5 days ago).
    This isn ‘t really increasing my motivation to start/keep using Magpie…

    I mainly signed up to check out the service – I’m not really keen on seeing an ad every 2 or 3 tweets. It’s hard enough to follow up on all of them without those ads…

  37. Stacy Lang

    First – twitter is unique in that it IS okay to advertise – in a sense. Think about @zappos or all the real estate people. Travel agents. The difference is, when someone needs something, they post, they INVITE a sales pitch. This gives a smart marketing company or person the opportunity to jump in and offer services. Hopefully by this time they’ve built up some “cred” by being real, interacting in ways other than just being a sales bot.

    Second – I’ve got someone with magpie in their stream. Granted they’re not anyone I follow faithfully, they’re just there, hidden in my low priority stream of tweetdeck. But that advertising? Annoying. I’m ready to block him. It fits right in with those people who I follow that immediately ask me to subscribe to their blog, or buy their product.

    If I want it, I’ll find you. Build a connection and when I need it, you’ll be top-of-mind. That’s how twitter works, and how advertising is evolving. Stop with the shove-it-down-our-throats advertising please.

  38. well, i think idea of Magpie won’t be popular as much it seems till now, until twitter introduce its own monetizing plan to get the readers ready for that. I hope many will agree with me.

    Majority are still looking it as big NO, well scenario can be changed as soon as person with huge followers start using it and share the revenues with his followers..

    This is my all over analysis

  39. I’ve never known you to be one to sit on the fence john.

    Someone like you could make a lot more just tweeting aff links to reasonable products every once in a while.

    Also, you need to come to some sort of arrangement with bluefur and start getting commisions on your referrals.

  40. I wouldn’t do it. If you have so many followers, you should be able to monetize without running the risk of dinging your reputation.

  41. I think not at this time…

    Concerns about security, and about actually SPAMMING my followers
    prevent me from being a “Magpie”.

    Be Well!
    ECS Dave

  42. I’m so not interested …. I like the indirect way you mentioned, John. More personal I think. Plus – I don’t want 2000+ followers – I’ve been trying to follow my followers (within limits) and that would make me nutty! :)

    Thanks for the good info. as always John.

  43. I will have to agree with you on this one John. I personally don’t care for twitter that much but I still use it once and awhile. It is no doubt a popular service right now but it is not that great. I use it mostly for posting my blog posts automatically with a plugin.

    Do you use that plugin?

  44. I think people will be naturally against it, and because there’s a #magpie tag. It’s almost like telling people I’m an ad, don’t click!

  45. I’m scared that my personal account gets spam if I join that.So I’ll wait and see too.

  46. Here’s an answer to your do i want to be a magpie question!

    Don’t Be A Magpie

  47. Great, let’s turn Twitter and every thing else into a spam source while we’re at it.

  48. From your end question, I take it that you want to run magpie and see if you lose followers! Is that so John?

Trackbacks

  1. Regarding Magpie. « Shytrblemaker’s Weblog - November 25, 2008 at 11:40 am
  2. Twitter Users Speak Out On Be a Magpie | John Chow dot Com - November 25, 2008 at 11:51 am
  3. @weblivz Entrepreneur, author & tech consultant. « Tweetabix - November 28, 2008 at 3:12 am
  4. Be a Magpie: A Spam Advertiser for Twitter » Power Maxx Blog - November 28, 2008 at 3:07 pm
  5. Talking » Magpie - December 11, 2008 at 11:21 pm