<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Video Is The Future of Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/</link>
	<description>The Miscellaneous Ramblings of a Dot Com Mogul</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-148769</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-148769</guid>
		<description>Besides laziness, most people are followers not innovators. They'll read John Chow and go do it. No plan, no thought--just follow. Load time alone could kill your traffic on a blog or website. No one wants to wait for a video to load. If they do, it better be worth it. If its not you're in trouble. 

The anticipation to watch a video on a site has more to do with who the site owner is and the trust they have gained in their readership which takes time and work. 

What about bandwith cost to the owner of the site? If a video becomes really popular the cost could go through the roof couldn't it? 
Maybe John could answer that question. Is bandwith something to be considered if you own your own site? On a hosted blog it may be advantageous but what is the cost for website owners who don't have Google to pick up the cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides laziness, most people are followers not innovators. They&#8217;ll read John Chow and go do it. No plan, no thought&#8211;just follow. Load time alone could kill your traffic on a blog or website. No one wants to wait for a video to load. If they do, it better be worth it. If its not you&#8217;re in trouble. </p>
<p>The anticipation to watch a video on a site has more to do with who the site owner is and the trust they have gained in their readership which takes time and work. </p>
<p>What about bandwith cost to the owner of the site? If a video becomes really popular the cost could go through the roof couldn&#8217;t it?<br />
Maybe John could answer that question. Is bandwith something to be considered if you own your own site? On a hosted blog it may be advantageous but what is the cost for website owners who don&#8217;t have Google to pick up the cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-148743</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-148743</guid>
		<description>the main reason is because people are lazy, and thats it.  People would stare at a video than to think and read</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the main reason is because people are lazy, and thats it.  People would stare at a video than to think and read</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geiger</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147737</link>
		<dc:creator>Geiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147737</guid>
		<description>I definitely think that it is the future, but until Search Engines can index the audio, it won't be all that it could be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think that it is the future, but until Search Engines can index the audio, it won&#8217;t be all that it could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Go</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147243</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Go</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 05:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147243</guid>
		<description>Great point.  But I had thought that being lazy is not me  :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point.  But I had thought that being lazy is not me  <img src='http://www.johnchow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get More Traffic &#124; Online Review</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147233</link>
		<dc:creator>Get More Traffic &#124; Online Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147233</guid>
		<description>[...] other blog post about future  blogging, described that video is a  future blogging for many reasons. As we know make a video is very [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other blog post about future  blogging, described that video is a  future blogging for many reasons. As we know make a video is very [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Review</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147228</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147228</guid>
		<description>Totally agree. Reader or visitor need more information, not only information but easily, modern and creative information format is very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. Reader or visitor need more information, not only information but easily, modern and creative information format is very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147189</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147189</guid>
		<description>But youtube isnt a blog?  :???:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But youtube isnt a blog?  <img src='http://www.johnchow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':???:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147187</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147187</guid>
		<description>I am lazy too but I do read newspapers  :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am lazy too but I do read newspapers  <img src='http://www.johnchow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank Rocks</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147186</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147186</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you. Newspapers are neglected. Many of them say, I dont read newspapers, I just watch news on TV. PEople are getting lazy and lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you. Newspapers are neglected. Many of them say, I dont read newspapers, I just watch news on TV. PEople are getting lazy and lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajaie AlKorani</title>
		<link>http://www.johnchow.com/why-video-is-the-future-of-blogging/#comment-147167</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajaie AlKorani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnchow.com/?p=4296#comment-147167</guid>
		<description>I think that if you're going to post a video, you should at least write a brief summary of what it's about below it. 
I have seen some website that have been using &lt;strong&gt;only video&lt;/strong&gt; for there posting, which has gained them lots of readers and popularity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that if you&#8217;re going to post a video, you should at least write a brief summary of what it&#8217;s about below it.<br />
I have seen some website that have been using <strong>only video</strong> for there posting, which has gained them lots of readers and popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
